13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

Table of contents | Previous page | Next page<br />

9.6. Evaluation <strong>and</strong> Assessment of Long-Term Subsonic Scenarios<br />

9.6.1. Difficulties in Constructing Long-Term Scenarios<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r reports in this collection<br />

Long-term (beyond 20 years) projections of aviation traffic dem<strong>and</strong>, fleet fuel burned, <strong>and</strong> fleet emissions are inevitably speculative. Difficulty in forecasting<br />

technological developments that might be appropriate for <strong>the</strong> long term, possible shifts in traffic dem<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> myriad uncertainties resulting from human society's<br />

development over <strong>the</strong> period in question all conspire to make long-term projections unreliable-sometimes astoundingly so. Given <strong>the</strong> state of <strong>the</strong> aviation industry 50<br />

years ago (in 1947), it is doubtful that ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> technology or <strong>the</strong> scope of <strong>the</strong> industry in 1997 could have been forecast. However, because <strong>the</strong> transport aviation<br />

market <strong>and</strong> aviation technology seem to be maturing, a plausible way of making projections far into <strong>the</strong> future is to make reasonable extrapolations based on our<br />

knowledge of present trends in <strong>the</strong> world <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> aviation industry. These extrapolations are termed scenarios, ra<strong>the</strong>r than forecasts, as outlined in Section 9.1.<br />

9.6.2. Structure <strong>and</strong> Assumptions<br />

Before we review <strong>the</strong> outcomes of <strong>the</strong> scenario studies in <strong>the</strong> following section, we consider<br />

some differences <strong>and</strong> similarities between <strong>the</strong> models. This comparison is restricted to <strong>the</strong> EDF,<br />

DTI, <strong>and</strong> FESG models. Although <strong>the</strong> MIT model provides an interesting insight into future travel<br />

options based on <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>sis of invariant travel time <strong>and</strong> travel expenditure budgets, it is excluded<br />

from this comparison because it provides only a highly aggregated scenario for <strong>the</strong> future<br />

mobility of total motorized passenger traffic; air traffic is only one-albeit important-portion of this<br />

picture, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> aircraft component cannot be identified. The WWF aviation scenario for 2041<br />

provides aggregated fuel burned <strong>and</strong> CO 2 emissions projections but does not provide regionally<br />

distributed NO x emissions estimates.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> long-term scenarios considered, <strong>the</strong> EDF, FESG, <strong>and</strong> DTI studies allow assessment of<br />

<strong>the</strong> impacts of CO 2 from aviation. However, only <strong>the</strong> results from <strong>the</strong> DTI <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> FESG models<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/143.htm (1 von 3)08.05.2008 02:44:32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!