13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

same as present-day values, even for larger aircraft types (600+ seats) that are assumed to enter service beginning in about 2005. All traffic is assumed to be carried<br />

by a subsonic aircraft fleet (i.e., no HSCT would be operating by 2050). The model forecasts traffic growth to be positive throughout <strong>the</strong> scenario, but growth rate<br />

declines during <strong>the</strong> period. Decadal capacity growth rates-actual <strong>and</strong> forecast-are given in Table 9-14. The traffic forecast includes civil <strong>and</strong> freight operations as well<br />

as civil charter <strong>and</strong> business jet traffic but excludes military aviation activity <strong>and</strong> possible future supersonic operations.<br />

Fuel usage was determined for <strong>the</strong> base year fleet from <strong>the</strong> capacity offered in that year (ASKs) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> fleet's traffic efficiency (ASK per kg fuel). A fuel efficiency trend<br />

suggested by Greene (1992) <strong>and</strong> modified by DTI was included as a scenario parameter, as given in Table 9-15.<br />

Table 9-18: Definition of regional economic groups in <strong>the</strong> EDF model.<br />

Group Members<br />

1 OECD members, except Japan<br />

2 Asian newly industrialized countries (NICs), Japan<br />

3 China <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> rest of Asia<br />

4 Africa, Latin America, Middle East<br />

5 Former Soviet Union (FSU), Eastern Europe<br />

The traffic efficiency of <strong>the</strong> fleet over <strong>the</strong> scenario period was estimated to range from 30 ASK kg -1 in <strong>the</strong> base year 1992 to 48 ASK kg -1 in 2050 (a 60% improvement).<br />

This estimate was based on <strong>the</strong> performance of existing aircraft types <strong>and</strong> forecasts of <strong>the</strong> type <strong>and</strong> number of aircraft (categorized by seat b<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> technology level)<br />

that might be flying in 2050. Future aircraft types included size developments to 799 seats.<br />

A major scenario element was <strong>the</strong> NOx reduction technology assumption. Current technology will allow engines to achieve reductions of around 30% below <strong>the</strong> current<br />

certification level (CAEP/2 st<strong>and</strong>ards). The basis of <strong>the</strong> technology scenario was that NOx regulations would be made considerably more stringent than today <strong>and</strong> that<br />

<strong>the</strong> manufacturing industry would develop appropriate technology solutions. This development was modeled by assuming that from 1992:<br />

● CAEP/2 certification st<strong>and</strong>ard applies to all new production from 2000<br />

● 30% reduction in ICAO recommended limits from CAEP/2 in 2005<br />

● 60% reduction from CAEP/2 phased in equally over 8 years from 2035.<br />

With a fleet development trend determined by <strong>the</strong> capacity forecast, <strong>the</strong> rate of introduction of <strong>the</strong> scenario above implies a global fleet emissions index trend that is as<br />

compatible with <strong>the</strong> relatively modest fuel efficiency assumption given in Table 9-16. The fleet EI(NO x ) of 7.0 implies widespread use of ultra-low NO x technology<br />

(Section 7.5). The total calculated fuel burned <strong>and</strong> emissions for 2050 under <strong>the</strong> DTI/ANCAT scenario are given in Table 9-17.<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/139.htm (4 von 5)08.05.2008 02:44:25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!