13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

or 2; see Section 9.4.1.2), form <strong>the</strong> complete designator for <strong>the</strong> FESG scenarios used<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> rest of this report.<br />

<strong>Global</strong> traffic from <strong>the</strong> model projections was apportioned over 45 regional traffic flows with a<br />

separate market share model because certain regions grow faster than o<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> correct<br />

distribution of traffic is important in <strong>the</strong> calculation of <strong>the</strong> effects of emissions on <strong>the</strong> atmosphere.<br />

In this procedure, regional traffic flows were expressed as a share of <strong>the</strong> global market; using <strong>the</strong><br />

market share <strong>and</strong> historical growth patterns ensures consistency between regional flows <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

global forecast. The underlying assumption of this procedure is that each regional share<br />

approaches its ultimate share of <strong>the</strong> total market asymptotically. Mature markets tend to have<br />

declining shares approaching an asymptotic value, whereas developing markets tend to increase<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir shares. Adjustments of traffic flows were made so that <strong>the</strong> "top-down" traffic projections of<br />

<strong>the</strong> FESG global model were matched by a reasonable "bottom-up" distribution of regional traffic<br />

flows. These traffic flows include all traffic in all regions, <strong>and</strong> regional variations in growth rates<br />

are highlighted. Factors that affect <strong>the</strong> operations of military <strong>and</strong> general aviation aircraft were<br />

also estimated, <strong>and</strong> projections were made of <strong>the</strong> growth of <strong>the</strong>se sectors (CAEP/4-FESG, 1998).<br />

Table 9-11: ICCAIA NO x <strong>and</strong> fuel-efficiency technology assumptions for 2050.<br />

Technology Scenario Fuel Efficiency Increase by 2050 LTO NO x Levels<br />

Design for fuel efficiency <strong>and</strong> NO x reduction<br />

Design for aggressive NO x reduction<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/138.htm (4 von 6)08.05.2008 02:44:24<br />

Average of production aircraft will be 40-50%<br />

better relative to 1997 levels<br />

Average of production aircraft will be 30-40%<br />

better relative to 1997 levels<br />

Table 9-12: Projected scheduled fleet fuel efficiency (Sutkus, 1997).<br />

Figure 9-19: Fleet average trends in EI(NO x ) showing<br />

projections for <strong>the</strong> two ICCAIA technology scenarios.<br />

Scheduled Fleet Fuel<br />

Efficiency (ASK kg-1 Fuel)<br />

2015 NASA Inventory 41.8<br />

Fleet average will be 10-30% below CAEP/2 limit<br />

by 2050; fleet average EI(NO x ) = 15.5 in 2050<br />

Average of production aircraft will be 30-50%<br />

below CAEP/2 limit by 2020 <strong>and</strong> 50-70% below<br />

CAEP/2 limit by 2050; fleet average

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!