13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

period 1960 through 1995. No constraints were imposed on <strong>the</strong> values <strong>the</strong> parameters could<br />

take. Fur<strong>the</strong>r details of <strong>the</strong> modeling process appear in CAEP/4-FESG (1998). Table 9-9 lists <strong>the</strong><br />

GDP growth assumptions used in developing <strong>the</strong>se scenarios (Leggett et al., 1992). The key<br />

assumptions of this approach follow:<br />

● The world can be treated as a single, gradually maturing aviation market that is <strong>the</strong> sum<br />

of regional markets at various stages of maturity.<br />

● Historical values of world dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> GDP over time provide sufficient information<br />

about <strong>the</strong> stage of development of <strong>the</strong> industry to provide reliable estimates of market<br />

maturity.<br />

● Business <strong>and</strong> personal travel sectors can be combined.<br />

● <strong>Global</strong> traffic growth is driven primarily by global GDP; as markets mature, overall<br />

passenger growth rates will eventually grow in line with GDP growth.<br />

● Fuel will be available, <strong>and</strong> fuel prices will not increase greatly relative to o<strong>the</strong>r costs.<br />

● Whatever aviation technological or regulatory changes occur, <strong>the</strong>y will have no significant<br />

impact on ticket prices, dem<strong>and</strong>, or service availability.<br />

● Infrastructure will be sufficient to h<strong>and</strong>le dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

● There will be no significant impacts from o<strong>the</strong>r travel modes (e.g., high-speed rail) or<br />

alternative technologies (e.g., telecommunications).<br />

Perhaps <strong>the</strong> most critical assumption of this methodology was that historical global traffic totals<br />

contained sufficient information about <strong>the</strong> maturity of <strong>the</strong> industry as a whole to provide a<br />

reasonable basis upon which long-term aviation trends could be projected. There is a question of<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> signals of recent years (i.e., that overall traffic growth is slowing) are sufficiently<br />

robust to provide a reliable indication of future long-term growth. A related concern is that<br />

historical world traffic totals are dominated by OECD experience, thus may not adequately<br />

capture <strong>the</strong> potential for growth in o<strong>the</strong>r, less-developed regions (CAEP/4-FESG, 1998). To a<br />

large extent, <strong>the</strong> FESG scenarios for 2050 reflect assumptions of no fundamental change in<br />

overall revenue/cost structure trends of <strong>the</strong> aviation industry <strong>and</strong> no fundamental changes in <strong>the</strong><br />

trends in technology or society. They also assume that <strong>the</strong> growth of air traffic dem<strong>and</strong> will not<br />

be significantly constrained by o<strong>the</strong>r limiting factors. Sections 9.6.5 <strong>and</strong> 9.6.6 examine <strong>the</strong><br />

availability of infrastructure <strong>and</strong> fuel with regard to <strong>the</strong> plausibility of all of <strong>the</strong> long-term scenario<br />

projections.<br />

Growth rates from <strong>the</strong> model were applied to 1995 reported world traffic dem<strong>and</strong> (Boeing, 1996)toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with GDP growth rates from <strong>the</strong> IPCC IS92a, IS92e, <strong>and</strong> IS92c scenarios-to produce<br />

FESG base case (Fa), high (Fe), <strong>and</strong> low (Fc) scenarios of scheduled traffic dem<strong>and</strong>. The high<br />

case (Fe) was adjusted slightly to match <strong>the</strong> NASA traffic forecast for 2015 on which <strong>the</strong> NASA<br />

2015 emission inventory was based. The basis for <strong>the</strong> NASA 2015 traffic forecasts were GDP<br />

forecasts that were similar to <strong>the</strong> IS92e GDP scenario (Boeing, 1996). The resulting traffic<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> average growth rate for <strong>the</strong> three 2050 scenarios are illustrated in Figures 9-16 <strong>and</strong><br />

9-17 <strong>and</strong> listed in Table 9-10. The traffic dem<strong>and</strong> scenarios have been labeled Fa through Fe for<br />

brevity; <strong>the</strong>se labels, when combined with <strong>the</strong> appropriate technology assumption designator (1<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/138.htm (3 von 6)08.05.2008 02:44:24<br />

Figure 9-17: Average traffic growth rates from FESG<br />

Figure 9-18: Fuel efficiency trends to 2050<br />

corresponding to <strong>the</strong> two ICCAIA technology scenarios<br />

for <strong>the</strong> FESG high traffic dem<strong>and</strong> case.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!