13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

8.3.5. Summary of O<strong>the</strong>r Operational Factors<br />

<strong>Aviation</strong> passenger mobility efficiency is very dependent on <strong>the</strong> type of aircraft, <strong>the</strong> configuration, <strong>the</strong> load factor, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> distance flown. Old aircraft use much more<br />

fuel per passenger-km than new aircraft of similar size. The fuel efficiency of different aircraft is examined in Chapter 7. The required energy per passenger-km is in <strong>the</strong><br />

range of 1.0 to 3.0 MJ per passenger-km, or about 30 to 110 g C per passenger-km. Airlines have generally optimized energy use per passenger-km, largely because<br />

of economic pressures <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> requirement within <strong>the</strong> industry to minimize operational costs. Thus, with or without environmental considerations, market <strong>and</strong> cost<br />

considerations are drivers for airlines to optimize <strong>the</strong> utilization of an aircraft as much as possible.<br />

CO2 intensity for rail transport also depends on factors such as energy source, type of locomotive, <strong>and</strong> load factor, <strong>and</strong> emissions of CO2 range between < 5 <strong>and</strong> 50 g<br />

C per passenger-km. However, a passenger's choice of mode of transport is based on fares, total trip time, <strong>and</strong> frequency-not just environmental considerations.<br />

ECAC (1996) estimates that less than 10% of <strong>the</strong> European air passenger travel could be replaced by high-speed train. Yet <strong>the</strong> scope for substitution is greater in<br />

Europe than in many o<strong>the</strong>r parts of <strong>the</strong> world.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r operational factors to reduce aircraft fuel burn include optimization of cruise speed, reduction of tankering, reduction of additional weight, <strong>and</strong> energy savings at<br />

<strong>the</strong> airport such as limitations on <strong>the</strong> use of APUs <strong>and</strong> reduced taxi times. The total potential reduction in fuel burn by fur<strong>the</strong>r optimization of <strong>the</strong>se factors is in <strong>the</strong><br />

range of 2-6%. The relative contribution of each factor is indicated in Table 8-6.<br />

Finally, aircraft noise mitigation measures such as operational changes <strong>and</strong> retrofitting of engine equipment on older aircraft to conform with current aircraft noise<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards could have an adverse effect on fuel use. Application of hushkits could lead to an increase in fuel consumption of up to 5%. However, lightweight hushkits<br />

may have a negligible effect on fuel use.<br />

Table of contents | Previous page | Next page<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r reports in this collection<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/127.htm (2 von 2)08.05.2008 02:44:09<br />

IPCC Homepage

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!