13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

Table of contents | Previous page | Next page<br />

7.8. <strong>Aviation</strong> Fuels<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r reports in this collection<br />

This section addresses <strong>the</strong> major fuel-related issues that have influenced <strong>and</strong> will continue to influence <strong>the</strong> development of aircraft into <strong>the</strong> foreseeable future. Almost<br />

all current civil <strong>and</strong> military aviation around <strong>the</strong> world uses a kerosene-type fuel. This class of fuel provides a good balance of properties currently required from an<br />

aviation fuel, in which energy density, operational issues, cost, <strong>and</strong> safety all need to be taken into account. This section examines some alternative fuels that will, no<br />

doubt, continue to be considered as <strong>the</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> for air transport continues <strong>and</strong> its impact on <strong>the</strong> environment grows.<br />

Fuel specifications that define physical properties, chemical composition, <strong>and</strong> performance tests<br />

have evolved over several decades. These fuel specifications are designed to balance quality,<br />

cost, <strong>and</strong> availability, thus guarantee a product of worldwide consistency. Although many<br />

countries have <strong>the</strong>ir own fuel specification, by general agreement among governing bodies, fuel<br />

suppliers, <strong>and</strong> aircraft manufacturers, all civil aviation fuel must effectively meet <strong>the</strong> requirements<br />

of American Society of Testing <strong>and</strong> Materials (ASTM) D1655 (ASTM, 1997) <strong>and</strong> Defense<br />

Evaluation <strong>and</strong> Research Agency (DERA) DEF STAN 91-91 (DERA, 1998). The ASTM<br />

specification contains two relevant fuel designations (Jet A <strong>and</strong> Jet A-1), which differ only in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

freezing points. The DEF STAN specification addresses only Jet A-1. Jet A fuel has a maximum<br />

freezing point of -40°C <strong>and</strong> is used only in <strong>the</strong> United States, where moderate temperatures<br />

combined with short flight times justify a separate specification to increase availability. Jet A-1<br />

has a maximum freezing-point requirement of -47°C to meet <strong>the</strong> low-temperature requirements<br />

of long, high-altitude flights <strong>and</strong> is used everywhere in <strong>the</strong> world except <strong>the</strong> United States. O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

differences between <strong>the</strong>se fuel specifications are relatively minor <strong>and</strong> immaterial to this report.<br />

The ICAO specification for fuel to be used in emissions testing of aircraft gas turbines is also a<br />

kerosene-type fuel (ICAO, 1993). Restrictions are placed only on <strong>the</strong> 10 properties that<br />

potentially affect emissions. Table 7-9 compares <strong>the</strong> ICAO specification with <strong>the</strong> ASTM <strong>and</strong> DEF<br />

STAN specifications for <strong>the</strong> relevant properties. The property limits of ICAO are somewhat more<br />

restrictive than <strong>the</strong> commercial specifications to limit testing concerns, but at <strong>the</strong> expense of cost<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/109.htm (1 von 3)08.05.2008 02:43:45<br />

Figure 7-36: Historical trends of sulfur content in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!