13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

aviation, <strong>the</strong> time <strong>and</strong> cost to introduce a change can be considerable. Safety considerations can combustor.<br />

also constrain application of new combustor designs to new engines. For example, a new<br />

combustor design is often introduced as a package that includes modifications to <strong>the</strong> combustion<br />

chamber, fuel nozzles, <strong>and</strong> engine control. Positive steps must be in place to prevent intermixing<br />

of new <strong>and</strong> old components during maintenance. Of course, o<strong>the</strong>r requirements-such as durability, weight, maintenance, <strong>and</strong> cost-must also be balanced during<br />

product introduction. This first technology "category" can also include improvements in o<strong>the</strong>r engine components, such as <strong>the</strong> engine turbomachinery, with or without<br />

concurrent combustor changes. Such improvements alone can lead to better fuel efficiency along with lower peak cycle temperatures, <strong>the</strong>reby reducing NOx <strong>and</strong> CO2 emissions <strong>and</strong> improving durability.<br />

The second category of near-term advances involves major changes such as introduction of "staged" combustors (see Figure 7-23). Staging was introduced to<br />

improve or provide an additional degree of freedom between operational <strong>and</strong> emissions requirements. Thus, <strong>the</strong> high-power stage of a combustor optimized for low<br />

NO x does not have to cope with low-power stability requirements, which are dealt with by bringing in o<strong>the</strong>r parts of <strong>the</strong> staged combustor when needed. Staged<br />

combustors, however, do require more complex control systems, incorporating fail-safe operation, to ensure that transient engine performance is not affected. This<br />

requirement is especially crucial for <strong>the</strong> most recent advances in low NO x technology, which rely on low temperature, lean combustion to achieve low NO x . Staged<br />

systems can present problems in achieving acceptable combustor exit temperature profiles, with associated losses in turbine efficiency, thus fuel efficiency. They are<br />

also heavier. Toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> complex interaction of improvements <strong>and</strong> penalties translates into a form of tradeoff between NO x , CO 2 , <strong>and</strong> HC/CO; work in this field<br />

continues to define designs that minimize penalties <strong>and</strong> maximize benefits.<br />

The only example of a staged combustor in aircraft service today is <strong>the</strong> dual annular combustor (DAC), which is shown in Figure 7-23a. The DAC is a staged system<br />

that incorporates two separate combustion zones. The pilot stage provides good operational performance required at low power. The main stage provides low NOx emissions at high power. Low NOx emissions are achieved with lean fuel/air mixtures, which reduce flame temperatures, <strong>and</strong> high throughput velocities, which reduce<br />

<strong>the</strong> residence time available to form NOx . Relative to current state-of-<strong>the</strong>-art NOx levels discussed above, a single annular combustor in an engine having a pressure<br />

ratio of approximately 30 achieves about 30% reduction in LTO NOx emissions, as shown in Figure 7-19, <strong>and</strong> NOx levels are about 40% below CAEP/2 st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

(ICAO, 1993). However, <strong>the</strong>se improvements do not come without some tradeoffs. For example, Figure 7-20 (Mongia, 1997b) compares CO <strong>and</strong> NOx emissions for <strong>the</strong><br />

conventional baseline combustor <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> DAC. Both combustors fall on approximately <strong>the</strong> same line, indicating an apparent increase in CO with reduced NOx . The<br />

DAC system is also more complex. To obtain requisite staging capability, <strong>the</strong> engine must be equipped with a full authority digital electronic control (FADEC) system.<br />

The FADEC system must deal with increased complexity of engine operation to accommodate <strong>the</strong> various staging modes <strong>and</strong> associated engine responses. The<br />

added complexity invariably involves additional development effort for any new application to ensure <strong>the</strong> achievement of acceptable ground-level <strong>and</strong> altitude starting,<br />

combustion efficiency, <strong>and</strong> turbine inlet temperature patterns. The NOx benefit is reduced in higher pressure ratio engines because of <strong>the</strong> increased competition for<br />

airflow to meet <strong>the</strong> conflicting requirements of durability <strong>and</strong> emissions.<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/102.htm (5 von 7)08.05.2008 02:43:36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!