13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

Table of contents | Previous page | Next page<br />

6.6.5. Climate Change<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r reports in this collection<br />

The ranges of aircraft perturbations to climate change examined in this report are, of course, small compared to <strong>the</strong> overall increase in RF expected throughout <strong>the</strong><br />

next century. Climate modeling of this transient change over <strong>the</strong> next 50 years cannot readily evaluate aircraft, or any equally small RF, in terms of specific climate<br />

changes because of problems in separating "signal" from "noise." Climate parameters that might be attributed to aircraft, such as <strong>the</strong> increase in global mean surface<br />

air temperature, are calculated here using a simple model consistent with previous IS92a relationships.<br />

The predicted change in global mean surface temperature is shown in Figure 6-17 for total<br />

warming in accord with IS92a (solid) <strong>and</strong> for <strong>the</strong> case in which all of aviation's contribution to<br />

global warming (scenario Fa1) is cut off (dotted line). Of total global warming of 0.9 K anticipated<br />

in 2050, about 0.05 K would be attributable to aviation. The Eab case anticipates a larger<br />

aviation component (0.09 K). One caveat is that aircraft may produce a different climate<br />

signature, one that is not represented by an increase in global mean temperature.<br />

To evaluate individual energy sectors as part of overall climate forcing, it is necessary to<br />

compare <strong>the</strong>ir summed radiative forcing from all atmospheric perturbations, not just that from<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir use of fossil-fuel carbon alone. The radiative forcing index-defined here as <strong>the</strong> ratio of total<br />

radiative forcing to that from CO 2 emissions alone-is a measure of <strong>the</strong> importance of aircraft-<br />

induced climate change relative to that from an equivalent sector with <strong>the</strong> same fossil fuel use<br />

but without any effect o<strong>the</strong>r than CO 2 (see also Section 6.2.3). In 1992, <strong>the</strong> RFI for aircraft was<br />

about 2.7, with an uncertainty of at least ±1.5. The RFI changes to 3.0 by 2015 <strong>the</strong>n drops to 2.6<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Fa1 scenario (see Table 6-1). This index ranges from 2.2 to 3.4 in <strong>the</strong> year 2050 for <strong>the</strong><br />

various E- <strong>and</strong> F-type scenarios for subsonic aviation <strong>and</strong> technical options considered here.<br />

The RFI increases from 2.6 to 3.4 with <strong>the</strong> addition of HSCT aircraft (scenario Fa1H), as a result<br />

of <strong>the</strong> effects of stratospheric water vapor. Thus, aircraft-induced climate change with RFI > 1<br />

points to <strong>the</strong> need for a complete scientific assessment ra<strong>the</strong>r than basing <strong>the</strong> climate impact on<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/086.htm (1 von 2)08.05.2008 02:43:15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!