13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

Table of contents | Previous page | Next page<br />

6.6. The Role of Aircraft in Climate Change-Evaluation of Sample Scenarios<br />

The overall impact of aviation on climate change in <strong>the</strong> next 50 years is evaluated here for a<br />

range of scenarios (see Section 6.1.3 <strong>and</strong> Table 6-3) in air traffic <strong>and</strong> potential options in<br />

civil aviation (e.g., low-NOx combustors, high-speed civil transport). <strong>Aviation</strong>'s role is<br />

considered within <strong>the</strong> context of climate change already being forced by greenhouse gases<br />

<strong>and</strong> expected to continue from growth of <strong>the</strong> world's economies (e.g., IPCC's IS92a<br />

scenario; see IPCC, 1992). The impact of air travel <strong>and</strong> climate change as a whole on<br />

society is beyond this scientific assessment of <strong>the</strong> role of aviation in physical climate<br />

change.<br />

This section combines <strong>the</strong> aviation impacts from Sections 6.3 <strong>and</strong> 6.4 evaluated for <strong>the</strong><br />

fixed-year scenarios (defined in Table 6-1) <strong>and</strong> places <strong>the</strong>m in a continuous time sequence<br />

(defined in Table 6-3) to compare with overall climate changes expected under IS92a. We<br />

assume that RFs are additive, so <strong>the</strong> issue of different climate sensitivities-for example, for<br />

aircraft-induced ozone perturbations versus those from co 2 (as discussed in Section 6.5)-<br />

introduces some additional error/ uncertainty when we use summed RF to deduce climate<br />

change. We have no alternative but to use RF as a metric of climate change because<br />

differences in forcing between <strong>the</strong> various subsonic options would not be reliably detected<br />

above <strong>the</strong> natural climate variability in many models. The summed RF, however, should<br />

provide a relative ranking of <strong>the</strong> different options discussed below.<br />

6.6.1. Individual Components of Radiative Forcing<br />

Figure 6-14a (IPCC, 1996) shows a bar chart of individual components of RF for all<br />

anthropogenic change for <strong>the</strong> 1990 atmosphere. This figure can be compared with 1992<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/083.htm (1 von 4)08.05.2008 02:43:12<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r reports in this collection<br />

Figure 6-14a: Bar charts of radiative forcing from all perturbations in<br />

1990 (from IPCC, 1996). Note scale change from (a) to (b). In (b),<br />

best estimate (bars) <strong>and</strong> high-low 67% probability intervals (whiskers)<br />

are given. No best estimate is shown for <strong>the</strong> cirrus clouds; ra<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong><br />

dashed line indicates a range of possible estimates. The evaluations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!