13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

Persistent contrails in <strong>the</strong> stratosphere are not likely because of <strong>the</strong> low ambient relative humidity. Radiative forcing from contrails from <strong>the</strong> proposed HSCT fleet may<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore be neglected in future scenarios of radiative forcing (except for <strong>the</strong> 11% reduction of subsonic RF from air traffic displaced by HSCT aircraft).<br />

6.4.5. Uncertainties<br />

It is difficult to constrain <strong>the</strong> direct <strong>and</strong> indirect climate effects of aerosols from aircraft. Measurements at altitude are not adequate to define <strong>the</strong> aircraft contribution<br />

today, so models representing emissions <strong>and</strong> subsequent chemical <strong>and</strong> physical transformations have adopted differing parameterizations to estimate atmospheric<br />

concentrations. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, different aerosol size distributions, <strong>the</strong> hygroscopic nature of some of <strong>the</strong> aerosol constituents, <strong>and</strong> mixing of different species of aerosol<br />

all lead to uncertainties in <strong>the</strong> radiative properties of aerosols. These uncertainties in <strong>the</strong> burden <strong>and</strong> radiative properties of aerosols emitted by aircraft lead to<br />

associated uncertainties in radiative forcing that are much larger than for a well-mixed, directly emitted greenhouse gas such as carbon dioxide.<br />

RF from aircraft emissions of greenhouse gases <strong>and</strong> aerosols can be constrained when <strong>the</strong> amount of radiatively important species is directly limited by emissions (e.<br />

g., CO 2 , H2O, sulfate, BC). However, it is more difficult to place upper limits on RF when <strong>the</strong> climate impact occurs indirectly, as in aircraft NOx production of O3 or-<br />

specifically here-in perturbations to naturally occurring clouds by aircraft aerosols.<br />

The indirect effect of aerosols from aircraft emissions on naturally occurring clouds cannot be quantified at present owing to <strong>the</strong> complexity of several processes such<br />

as ice-cloud nucleation <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> dependence of albedo <strong>and</strong> emissivity on <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> ice crystals. With our present knowledge, this uncertainty must be considered<br />

significant. Radiative forcing from contrails is estimated to grow disproportionately with fuel use, <strong>and</strong> extrapolation to large values in 2050 is an important uncertainty in<br />

<strong>the</strong> future radiative impact of aviation. Fur<strong>the</strong>r uncertainty arises from <strong>the</strong> fact that all estimates of contrail RF were made for <strong>the</strong> present climate, hence do not account<br />

for future climate change (see discussion in Section 3.7.1).<br />

Table of contents | Previous page | Next page<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r reports in this collection<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/080.htm (2 von 2)08.05.2008 02:43:07<br />

IPCC Homepage

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!