13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

Table of contents | Previous page | Next page<br />

6.3.2. Radiative Forcing for CO 2<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r reports in this collection<br />

Carbon dioxide has a long atmospheric residence time (on <strong>the</strong> order of many decades); hence, aircraft CO 2 becomes well mixed within <strong>the</strong> atmosphere <strong>and</strong> can be<br />

treated toge<strong>the</strong>r with o<strong>the</strong>r anthropogenic CO 2 emissions in conventional global warming simulations (e.g., Washington <strong>and</strong> Meehl, 1989; Cubasch et al., 1992;<br />

Murphy <strong>and</strong> Mitchell, 1995). The aircraft influence depends on <strong>the</strong> temporal evolution of <strong>the</strong> amount of <strong>the</strong> CO 2 increase that can be attributed to aircraft emissions,<br />

which is directly proportional to <strong>the</strong> amount of fuel burned. See Section 6.1.2 <strong>and</strong> Table 6-2 for <strong>the</strong> calculation of CO 2 increases attributed to aviation.<br />

Over <strong>the</strong> period 1990 to 2050, under IS92a we expect an increase in atmospheric CO 2 of about 155 ppmv from burning of fossil fuels, cement production, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

anthropogenic activities that release biospheric carbon. By 2050, F-type aviation scenarios produce a 5-7 ppmv increase, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> high-growth Edh scenario leads to a<br />

13 ppmv increase. Thus, aviation in <strong>the</strong>se scenarios would be responsible for 3-8% of <strong>the</strong> total anthropogenic increase in CO 2 from 1990 to 2050.<br />

The RF for aviation CO 2 in 1992 is estimated to be +0.018 W m-2, with a likely range of ±30% that includes uncertainties in <strong>the</strong> carbon cycle <strong>and</strong> in radiative<br />

calculations (see WMO, 1999). Uncertainties <strong>and</strong> confidence intervals discussed here do not include possible errors in predicting future scenarios. By 2050, <strong>the</strong><br />

different aviation scenarios have a range of +0.06 to +0.16 W m-2. The technology option 2 scenario (Fa2) leads to a 0.1 ppmv increase in CO 2 by 2050, with only a<br />

small increase in CO 2 -RF.<br />

The HSCT option, F1aH, has 18% greater fuel use but only 8% greater CO 2 concentrations by 2050, with a corresponding increase in CO 2 -RF from +0.074 to +0.080<br />

W m-2. Because <strong>the</strong> HSCT fleet has just reached maturity in 2040, <strong>the</strong> extra fuel consumption of <strong>the</strong> HSCT aircraft is barely felt in terms of <strong>the</strong> accumulation of CO 2 .<br />

Similarly, <strong>the</strong> CO 2 impact of new subsonic technologies that are introduced linearly between 2015 <strong>and</strong> 2050 is not fully effected by 2050. A fuller evaluation would have<br />

to extend <strong>the</strong> assessment beyond 2050, when <strong>the</strong> cumulative effects of mature fleets would be felt (e.g., Sausen <strong>and</strong> Schumann, 1999).<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/074.htm (1 von 2)08.05.2008 02:43:00

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!