13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

Table of contents | Previous page | Next page<br />

5.2. Comparison of Measured <strong>and</strong> Calculated Variabilities in UV Irradiance<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r reports in this collection<br />

UV irradiance at <strong>the</strong> surface of <strong>the</strong> Earth depends on several variable factors identified in Section 5.1. These factors include scattering (Rayleigh, aerosol, <strong>and</strong> cloud)<br />

<strong>and</strong> absorption (ozone, aerosol, <strong>and</strong> pollution) processes that occur in <strong>the</strong> atmosphere, as well as variations in extraterrestrial solar flux <strong>and</strong> ground reflectivity.<br />

Variability in each of <strong>the</strong>se factors combines to produce large fluctuations in UV irradiance-for example, between corresponding months of different years<br />

(Wea<strong>the</strong>rhead et al., 1997). This large variability makes it difficult to quantify systematic decadal changes in UV irradiance <strong>and</strong> interpret <strong>the</strong>m in terms of cause <strong>and</strong><br />

effect with instruments o<strong>the</strong>r than well-maintained spectroradiometers.<br />

It is important to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> quantify <strong>the</strong> individual effects of <strong>the</strong> many variables affecting UV irradiance at <strong>the</strong> surface of <strong>the</strong> Earth. The contributions of <strong>the</strong><br />

different variables can be studied with <strong>the</strong> use of radiative transfer models. Several models have been developed for a variety of applications (Dave, 1965; Frederick<br />

<strong>and</strong> Lubin, 1988; Stamnes et al., 1988; Madronich, 1992; Ruggaber et al., 1994; Forster, 1995; Herman et al., 1996). These models use extraterrestrial solar spectral<br />

irradiance (Mentall et al., 1981; Neckel <strong>and</strong> Labs, 1984; Kaye <strong>and</strong> Miller, 1996; Woods et al., 1996) as input <strong>and</strong> simulate <strong>the</strong> physical processes that occur as<br />

radiation is scattered <strong>and</strong> absorbed by <strong>the</strong> atmosphere <strong>and</strong> at <strong>the</strong> surface of <strong>the</strong> Earth. Model output includes global (direct plus diffuse) <strong>and</strong> diffuse spectral radiation<br />

at <strong>the</strong> Earth's surface in a form that can be compared with measurements.<br />

The comparison of UV measurements with model simulations is an important exercise for checking both <strong>the</strong> accuracy of <strong>the</strong> model <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> quality of measurements.<br />

Once it is demonstrated that <strong>the</strong> measurements <strong>and</strong> model results are in good agreement for a wide range of conditions, a reliable simulation of <strong>the</strong> transfer of UV<br />

radiation through <strong>the</strong> atmosphere is possible. The model can <strong>the</strong>n be used with confidence to extend a measurement series in time <strong>and</strong> in space (between groundbased<br />

stations), provided measurements of all variables affecting surface UV irradiance are available. The model can also estimate future levels of surface UV<br />

irradiance by using predictions of variables such as aerosols or ozone that may change as a result of increased air traffic. Models are used in this context in Section<br />

5.4.<br />

Comparisons between models <strong>and</strong> measurements are best evaluated by two approaches. One is <strong>the</strong> comparison of irradiance as a function of wavelength normalized<br />

to a certain wavelength-usually in <strong>the</strong> UV-A, where ozone has a negligible effect. This comparison emphasizes <strong>the</strong> response of irradiance to variables that are strongly<br />

wavelength-dependent (such as ozone absorption or wavelength error) <strong>and</strong> minimizes effects that are weakly wavelength-dependent, such as clouds, aerosols, or <strong>the</strong><br />

absolute calibration of instrument responsivity. The second approach is <strong>the</strong> comparison of absolute irradiances at <strong>the</strong> wavelength of <strong>the</strong> normalization to quantify<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/057.htm (1 von 3)08.05.2008 02:42:38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!