13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

However, soot<br />

particles may act<br />

as condensation<br />

nuclei for sulfate<br />

or o<strong>the</strong>r species,<br />

modifying cirrus<br />

clouds in <strong>the</strong> UT<br />

or LS, <strong>and</strong> locally<br />

<strong>the</strong>y may be<br />

important in <strong>the</strong><br />

destruction of O 3<br />

(Bekki, 1997;<br />

Lary et al., 1997).<br />

Thus, we present<br />

some estimates<br />

of soot densities<br />

<strong>and</strong> SADs for<br />

future scenarios<br />

to complement<br />

those estimated<br />

for <strong>the</strong> current<br />

(1992) subsonic<br />

fleet already<br />

given in Chapter<br />

3. There are large<br />

uncertainties with<br />

regard to <strong>the</strong><br />

sources <strong>and</strong><br />

distribution of<br />

soot particles.<br />

Emissions from<br />

aircraft are<br />

Figure 4-12: Annual average zonal mean change of ozone in <strong>the</strong> 30-<br />

60°N latitude b<strong>and</strong> for supersonic aircraft perturbations from AER-2D,<br />

GSFC-2D, <strong>and</strong> UNIVAQ-2D models in (a) 2015 <strong>and</strong> (b) 2050. Model<br />

scenarios are those passed through to Chapters 5 <strong>and</strong> 6.<br />

particularly uncertain. Few global modeling studies are available for <strong>the</strong>se aerosols (see Chapter 3 for details). Emissions of soot by aircraft [EI(soot)=0.03-0.4 g/kg]<br />

(Friedl, 1997) have been studied by Bekki (1997), who used <strong>the</strong> Cambridge 2-D aerosol/soot model for past <strong>and</strong> present air traffic, <strong>and</strong> more recently by Rahmes et al.<br />

(1998) for current <strong>and</strong> future aircraft fleets.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> results presented herein, <strong>the</strong> aircraft-generated soot distribution was approximated by scaling <strong>the</strong> distribution of passive tracer calculated according to aircraft<br />

fuel burn (see also Chapter 3). A number of models have calculated this distribution for 2015 <strong>and</strong> 2050 (1992 distribution is shown in Table 3-4); all show <strong>the</strong> largest<br />

mass mixing ratio at about 12-km altitude <strong>and</strong> poleward of 40°N. The results for subsonic aircraft in <strong>the</strong> years 2015 <strong>and</strong> 2050 (IS92 Scenario 1) are shown in Table 4-<br />

15. For 2015, some results are also included for subsonic <strong>and</strong> HSCT aircraft toge<strong>the</strong>r. These numbers represent an upper limit because sedimentation is neglected.<br />

Soot particles could also be lost by coagulation with larger sulfate aerosols <strong>and</strong> by condensation of H 2 SO 4 -H 2 O on <strong>the</strong> particle surface.<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/051.htm (9 von 10)08.05.2008 02:42:31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!