13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

that modeling of <strong>the</strong> propagation of PSC processing effects onto global scales is very<br />

uncertain.<br />

Solomon et al. (1997) pointed out that <strong>the</strong> presence of high cirrus clouds near <strong>the</strong> tropical<br />

tropopause could decrease O 3 in <strong>the</strong> stratosphere by activating chlorine constituents.<br />

Emissions of H 2 O <strong>and</strong> NO x from supersonic <strong>and</strong> subsonic aircraft have <strong>the</strong> potential to<br />

increase <strong>the</strong> occurrence of high cirrus clouds (see Chapter 2). This effect is not evaluated<br />

by <strong>the</strong> model simulations performed in this chapter.<br />

4.4.2.5. Underlying Subsonic Fleet<br />

In all scenarios for 2050 except two (S11a <strong>and</strong> S12a), <strong>the</strong> subsonic fleet was as defined for<br />

<strong>the</strong> 2015 scenarios. For scenarios S11a <strong>and</strong> S12a, a more realistic representation of <strong>the</strong><br />

subsonic fleet in 2050 was used. For example, scenario S11a was compared with <strong>the</strong> IS92a<br />

predicted subsonic fleet scenario F (scenario Fa1 in Chapter 9), <strong>and</strong> scenario S12a was<br />

compared with <strong>the</strong> high-dem<strong>and</strong> subsonic fleet scenario G (scenario Fe1 in Chapter 9). As<br />

for all o<strong>the</strong>r supersonic scenarios, S11a <strong>and</strong> S12a contain subsonic aircraft emissions as<br />

well as HSCT aircraft emissions; <strong>the</strong> combination accounts for <strong>the</strong> same passenger dem<strong>and</strong><br />

as in subsonic-only scenarios F <strong>and</strong> G for 2050. Scenarios S9d, S11a, <strong>and</strong> S12a have<br />

similar supersonic components, but <strong>the</strong> subsonic components in <strong>the</strong> perturbed <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> base<br />

runs (D9, F, <strong>and</strong> G, respectively) are very different. There are only minor differences in<br />

predicted total column O 3 change for a particular model in ei<strong>the</strong>r hemisphere related to<br />

assumptions about <strong>the</strong> underlying subsonic fleet size (Table 4-12). Therefore, <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong><br />

underlying subsonic fleet is computed to have only a minor impact on predicted O 3 changes<br />

from <strong>the</strong> projected supersonic fleet.<br />

4.4.2.6. Future <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

An additional uncertainty associated with <strong>the</strong> calculation of future aircraft impact is related to<br />

<strong>the</strong> increasing trend of greenhouse gases in <strong>the</strong> atmosphere <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> impact on<br />

stratospheric temperatures <strong>and</strong> transport. For example, a CO 2 mixing ratio of about 500<br />

ppmv is <strong>the</strong> recommendation of WMO (1992) for CO 2 in <strong>the</strong> year 2050-about 1.5 times <strong>the</strong><br />

1980 value. The change in radiative forcing as a result of greenhouse gas increases will<br />

affect stratospheric temperature <strong>and</strong> circulation (see Chapter 12 of WMO, 1999, <strong>and</strong><br />

references <strong>the</strong>rein); this effect has not been taken into consideration here. The likely cooler<br />

future stratosphere would delay <strong>the</strong> recovery of polar O 3 in Arctic <strong>and</strong> Antarctic regions,<br />

which could affect <strong>the</strong> future impact of aircraft.<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/051.htm (7 von 10)08.05.2008 02:42:31<br />

Figure 4-10: Annual average zonal mean change of ozone in <strong>the</strong> 30-<br />

60°N latitude b<strong>and</strong> for various perturbations from UiO-3D <strong>and</strong> AER-<br />

2D models. Predictions are shown for (a) both models in 1992; <strong>and</strong><br />

(b) UiO-3D model in 1992, 2015, <strong>and</strong> 2050.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!