13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

4.4.2.3. Stratospheric Chemistry<br />

Current models do quite well in reproducing <strong>the</strong> general behavior of O 3 in <strong>the</strong> stratosphere. Never<strong>the</strong>less, as is evident from <strong>the</strong> discussion in Chapter 2 <strong>and</strong> above,<br />

problems remain. For example, <strong>the</strong>re appears to be a discrepancy of about 30% between calculated <strong>and</strong> measured O 3 levels near <strong>the</strong> stratopause (Osterman et al.,<br />

1997). In addition, related problems emerge with a careful comparison with observations, such as <strong>the</strong> ratio of active to reservoir species for Cl y (Michelsen et al.,<br />

1996). These problems may be alleviated by <strong>the</strong> inclusion of new HCl <strong>and</strong> hydrogen bromide (HBr) formation rates (see Chapter 2).<br />

Table 4-15a: Carbon soot mass mixing ratio from future aircraft [(50°N, annual average, pptm, EI(soot)=0.04 g/kg);<br />

approximate conversion factors to ng/m 3 are 0.3 at 12 km <strong>and</strong> 0.1 at 20 km].<br />

2015<br />

Subsonic<br />

2015<br />

Subsonic + HSCT<br />

2050<br />

Subsonic<br />

Model 12 km 20 km 12 km 20 km 12 km 20 km<br />

AER<br />

ECHAm 3 /CHEM<br />

Tm 3 /KNMI<br />

UiO<br />

UNIVAQ-2D<br />

UNIVAQ-3D<br />

2.0<br />

0.9<br />

1.7<br />

2.6<br />

3.0<br />

2.9<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.4<br />

0.7<br />

0.2<br />

0.5<br />

Table 4-15b: Carbon soot column from future aircraft (50°N,<br />

annual average, ng/cm 2 , EI(soot)=0.04 g/kg).<br />

Model<br />

AER<br />

Tm3 /KNMI<br />

UiO<br />

UNIVAQ-2D<br />

UNIVAQ-3D<br />

2015<br />

Subsonic<br />

0.58<br />

0.44<br />

0.68<br />

0.70<br />

0.69<br />

4.8<br />

5.1<br />

4.1<br />

3.7<br />

10.8<br />

9.1<br />

9.5<br />

9.2<br />

2015<br />

Subsonic + HSCT<br />

2.18<br />

1.53<br />

1.70<br />

1.52<br />

2.8<br />

1.4<br />

3.8<br />

4.6<br />

4.5<br />

0.9<br />

0.6<br />

1.0<br />

0.3<br />

0.8<br />

2050<br />

Subsonic<br />

The models generally assume <strong>the</strong> same set of reaction rate constants <strong>and</strong> photodissociation cross-sections based on <strong>the</strong> DeMore et al. (1997) recommendations.<br />

Comparisons of results for a subset of models (AER, CSIRO, GSFC, LARC, LLNL, SLIMCAT) in a benchmark at photostationary steady-state (Stolarski et al., 1995)<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/051.htm (5 von 10)08.05.2008 02:42:31<br />

0.84<br />

1.00<br />

1.06<br />

1.04

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!