13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

Clearly, an important uncertainty in <strong>the</strong> evaluation of <strong>the</strong> effects of aircraft is <strong>the</strong> representation of transport in <strong>the</strong> 2-D <strong>and</strong> 3-D models used to simulate <strong>the</strong> effect of<br />

supersonic aircraft emissions. The research community recognizes this general limitation, <strong>and</strong> an ongoing exercise (Models <strong>and</strong> Measurements II, Park et al., 1999)<br />

should help to quantify some of <strong>the</strong> transport differences among <strong>the</strong> models. Models <strong>and</strong> Measurements II is an activity supported by NASA to test models through<br />

detailed comparisons with measurements. It is a follow-on of <strong>the</strong> Models <strong>and</strong> Measurements workshop completed several years ago (Pra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> Remsberg, 1993).<br />

The results of Models <strong>and</strong> Measurements II should be available by <strong>the</strong> end of 1999.<br />

New analysis techniques of models relying on "age of air" (Hall <strong>and</strong> Plumb, 1994), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6 ) (Elkins et al., 1996), <strong>and</strong> CO2 (Boering et al., 1996)<br />

measurements allow more detailed comparisons to test <strong>the</strong> transport of models. Most models tend to underestimate <strong>the</strong> observed "age of air;" <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong> derived<br />

delta NOy <strong>and</strong> H2O for <strong>the</strong>se models is probably a lower limit. As a result, <strong>the</strong> models will tend to underestimate O3 depletion from supersonic aircraft.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r measure of transport uncertainty is illustrated by significant differences in mixing ratios calculated for NOy accumulation in <strong>the</strong> stratosphere from supersonic<br />

aircraft emissions (Figure 4-6a). This uncertainty reflects differences in lower stratospheric residence times for <strong>the</strong> different models.<br />

The atmosphere undergoes large variations from one year to <strong>the</strong> next. These interannual variations will drive a different transport of constituents, which will lead to<br />

significant differences in <strong>the</strong> impact of supersonic emissions on O 3 . Jackman et al. (1991) simulated very different aircraft-induced O 3 changes using separate<br />

dynamical fields; a slow (rapid) circulation simulation caused larger (smaller) O 3 decreases. The SLIMCAT model has been used with a yearly varying transport<br />

recently <strong>and</strong> has computed total O 3 decreases that vary significantly in <strong>the</strong> same months of different years.<br />

4.4.2.2. Model Resolution/Dimensionality<br />

As noted above, <strong>the</strong> formidable computational resources required to conduct long-term multiyear 3-D stratospheric simulations for assessment has made it necessary<br />

to use 2-D models. Although <strong>the</strong> 2-D models have very sophisticated formulations for gas phase chemical processes, <strong>the</strong>ir meridianal resolution is typically 5° (550 km)<br />

or coarser in latitude <strong>and</strong> 1 km or more in altitude throughout <strong>the</strong> stratosphere. Intrinsically, this resolution limits <strong>the</strong>ir ability to treat LS transport processes. In addition,<br />

because atmospheric species are treated in a zonally averaged manner, effects such as PSC formation <strong>and</strong> chemical processing must be parameterized more crudely<br />

than in 3-D models.<br />

Issues of spatial resolution <strong>and</strong> dimensionality of models are very pertinent to <strong>the</strong> treatment of PSCs <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> processing of polar air. 2-D models do not adequately<br />

parameterize <strong>the</strong> zonal variation of temperature, thus <strong>the</strong> formation of PSCs. Even 3-D models do not capture <strong>the</strong> different horizontal temperature scales within <strong>the</strong><br />

Arctic stratosphere. For example, even though synoptic conditions would suggest o<strong>the</strong>rwise, low temperatures <strong>and</strong> PSCs may be induced by wave flow over<br />

mountains (Carslaw et al., 1998); this mesoscale phenomenon is not directly addressed by most models to date. This uncertainty in assessing impacts from aircraft<br />

could be an even more important issue in trying to assess future impacts when <strong>the</strong> stratosphere may be cooler because of enhanced CO 2 mixing ratios (Shindell et al.,<br />

1998).<br />

Yet ano<strong>the</strong>r, quite different, resolution problem that may limit our ability to model chemical effects is that of filamentation processes, whereby winter polar air consists of<br />

long but narrow (< 5 km) filaments of gas in which species densities are different. O 3 depletion studies performed at very high horizontal resolution for <strong>the</strong> winter Arctic<br />

(Edouard et al., 1996) have underlined <strong>the</strong> uncertainty in calculating chemical loss of O 3 from differing resolutions.<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/051.htm (4 von 10)08.05.2008 02:42:31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!