13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

4.4.1. Uncertainties in Calculated Effects of Subsonic Aircraft Emissions<br />

4.4.1.1. Transport <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fuel Study<br />

One means of assessing model uncertainties from transport is by comparing concentrations of inert or passive tracers with specified input <strong>and</strong> removal rates. For such<br />

species, it may be assumed that differences in distribution are solely a result of transport <strong>and</strong> its representation because chemistry plays no role. The results of such<br />

an experiment are described in Section 3.3.4.1 <strong>and</strong> Danilin et al. (1998). Because <strong>the</strong> emissions in this experiment are based on fuel use by subsonic aircraft, <strong>the</strong><br />

experiment tests <strong>the</strong> transport characteristics of models in <strong>the</strong> UT <strong>and</strong> LS. Mixing ratios of fuel tracer are roughly 10-100 ng/g between 8-16 km north of 30°N.<br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Hemisphere stratospheric concentrations are about a factor of 4 less than in <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Hemisphere. Although <strong>the</strong> general pattern of <strong>the</strong> test tracer is<br />

qualitatively similar among various models, <strong>the</strong> maximum tracer concentrations deviate by a factor of 10 among <strong>the</strong> models. Some of this difference may be an artifact<br />

of low vertical resolution, but <strong>the</strong> results clearly point to uncertainties that need to be resolved.<br />

One of <strong>the</strong> major problems with model tranport is that stratospheric-tropospheric exchange (STE) is poorly represented in current models of any dimension. Current<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory has air entering <strong>the</strong> stratosphere through <strong>the</strong> tropics <strong>and</strong> returning at mid-latitudes. However, recent measurements of chemical tracers such as H 2 O <strong>and</strong> CO,<br />

diagnostic of tropospheric air, suggest that <strong>the</strong> lowest few kilometers of <strong>the</strong> lowermost stratosphere can be impacted by air being convected from <strong>the</strong> lower troposphere<br />

(Dessler et al., 1995; Lelieveld et al., 1997). These areas require more evaluation.<br />

One of <strong>the</strong> problems that has not been addressed in <strong>the</strong>se studies is sub-grid-scale parameterizations. This issue includes dispersion of material in <strong>the</strong> plume to <strong>the</strong><br />

regional scale, which is typical of <strong>the</strong> grid resolution of most models. In addition, exchange of air between <strong>the</strong> troposphere <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> stratosphere takes place on a<br />

variety of scales, <strong>and</strong> only <strong>the</strong> larger scales are modeled with any reliability.<br />

Thus, it is very difficult to assess inherent uncertainties in model results that are products of limitations in modeling transport. Never<strong>the</strong>less, as explained in Section 4.5,<br />

we attempt such an assessment by comparing <strong>the</strong> different models in a semi-quantitative manner.<br />

4.4.1.2. Chemistry<br />

The chemistry of VOCs (NMHC, acetone) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> transport of peroxides to <strong>the</strong> upper troposphere have recently been found to play important roles in <strong>the</strong> HOx radical<br />

balance (Singh et al., 1995; Folkins et al., 1997; Jaeglé et al., 1997; McKeen et al., 1997; Pra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> Jacob, 1997; Wennberg et al., 1998). An additional source of<br />

HOx in <strong>the</strong> UT could significantly influence O3 production efficiencies. This uncertainty would propagate through <strong>the</strong> 3-D tropospheric models because <strong>the</strong>re are large<br />

differences in chemistry modules. To some degree, this effect has been explored <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> results tabulated in Table 4-6. Fur<strong>the</strong>r model studies clearly are needed.<br />

NO x plays a key role in <strong>the</strong> O 3 generation process in <strong>the</strong> UT <strong>and</strong> LS, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re are significant differences in predicted NO x levels among <strong>the</strong> models. However,<br />

because of <strong>the</strong> limited number of observations <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> large temporal <strong>and</strong> spatial variations of <strong>the</strong>se observations, it is difficult to validate modeled upper tropospheric<br />

<strong>and</strong> lower stratospheric concentrations (see Chapter 2).<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> process studies referred to in Chapter 2 point to a strong dependence of O 3 production on NO x levels, <strong>the</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard simulations <strong>and</strong> sensitivity studies<br />

presented in Chapter 4 show a limited impact of nonlinear chemistry on O 3 perturbations. For example, all of <strong>the</strong> 3-D CTM st<strong>and</strong>ard simulations for 1992, 2015, <strong>and</strong><br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/051.htm (2 von 10)08.05.2008 02:42:31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!