13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

in <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Hemisphere than <strong>the</strong> GSFC model but smaller Nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

Hemisphere perturbations. Aircraft-induced NOy enhancements in <strong>the</strong> middle<br />

stratosphere are greatest in <strong>the</strong> THINAIR, GSFC, <strong>and</strong> SLIMCAT models for<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Hemisphere <strong>and</strong> tropical regions. Overall, <strong>the</strong> AER, CSIRO, LLNL, <strong>and</strong><br />

THINAIR models show <strong>the</strong> greatest Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Hemisphere isolation of supersonic<br />

aircraft effluent among <strong>the</strong> participating assessment models. The UNIVAQ, LARC,<br />

<strong>and</strong> SCTM1 models derive a maximum Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Hemisphere LS NOy abundance<br />

increase similar to CSIRO. However, <strong>the</strong>se models derive relatively small horizontal<br />

gradients in <strong>the</strong> LS horizontal spread in NOy <strong>and</strong> H 2 O, extending from Nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

Hemisphere mid-latitudes to Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Hemisphere high latitudes, suggesting a<br />

weak tropical/mid-latitude barrier to mixing. The UNIVAQ, SLIMCAT, SCTM1, <strong>and</strong><br />

LARC models generate Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Hemisphere LS NOy <strong>and</strong> H 2 O magnitudes that<br />

are similar to those of <strong>the</strong> GSFC model. To first order, <strong>the</strong> spread in model-derived<br />

changes in total O 3 for <strong>the</strong> ensemble of scenarios shown in Tables 4-11 <strong>and</strong> 4-12 is<br />

a direct result of large differences between supersonic aircraft-induced<br />

perturbations in <strong>the</strong> NOy <strong>and</strong> H 2 O fields.<br />

4.3.3.2. Profile <strong>and</strong> Column Ozone Change<br />

The percentage change in profile O 3 for June is shown in Figure 4-6c for scenario<br />

S1c-D. Above 25 km, in all models, local O 3 abundance is reduced as a result of<br />

including supersonic aircraft emissions of NO x <strong>and</strong> H 2 O. This result is not surprising<br />

because all assessment models represent <strong>the</strong> NOx (middle stratosphere) <strong>and</strong> HOx (upper stratosphere) chemical families as prime contributors to odd-oxygen loss<br />

above 25 km, in approximately <strong>the</strong> same relative importance. Therefore, sensitivity<br />

to NOx <strong>and</strong> H2O emissions from supersonic aircraft exhaust is similar in <strong>the</strong>se<br />

regions <strong>and</strong> roughly proportional to calculated perturbations in NOy <strong>and</strong> H 2 O.<br />

Below 25 km, <strong>the</strong> relative odd-oxygen loss partitioning between NO x , HO x , <strong>and</strong><br />

ClO x -BrO x chemical families is highly model-dependent. This situation is evident in<br />

<strong>the</strong> calculated local O 3 change. Models that are more HO x dominant in <strong>the</strong> LS tend<br />

to show a more positive response to added aircraft NO x . The opposite is true for<br />

models that are more NO x dominant. These variations are a result of different<br />

methodologies of transport <strong>and</strong> chemistry incorporated in <strong>the</strong> individual models.<br />

The percentage change in total column O3 is shown in Figure 4-6d for scenario S1c-<br />

D. Six of <strong>the</strong> models (AER, CSIRO, GSFC, LLNL, SCTM1, <strong>and</strong> UNIVAQ) indicate<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/050.htm (2 von 10)08.05.2008 02:42:29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!