13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

Table of contents | Previous page | Next page<br />

4.3.3. Model Results for Supersonic Aircraft Emissions<br />

4.3.3.1. NOy <strong>and</strong> H2O Enhancement<br />

Supersonic aircraft emissions of NOx <strong>and</strong> H2O were incorporated within six 2-D<br />

models <strong>and</strong> three 3-D models. These supersonic aircraft emissions are primarily<br />

deposited within <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Hemisphere LS. Figure 4-6 shows calculated<br />

perturbations in NOy <strong>and</strong> H2O from HSCT emissions in June 2015 with EI(NOx )=5<br />

(scenario S1c-D). Maximum perturbations occur in <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Hemisphere LS<br />

<strong>and</strong> range from 0.6 to 1.0 ppbv for NOy <strong>and</strong> from 0.4 to 0.7 ppmv for H 2 O. Based<br />

on <strong>the</strong> calculated perturbation in NOy <strong>and</strong> H 2 O, one can conclude that <strong>the</strong> transport<br />

fields of <strong>the</strong>se multi-dimensional assessment models are significantly different. For<br />

example, <strong>the</strong> GSFC model shows a significantly larger calculated perturbation in<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Hemisphere lower stratospheric NOy than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r models (20-40%<br />

higher peak NOy abundance). This model also transports more NOy <strong>and</strong> H 2 O<br />

higher into <strong>the</strong> middle stratosphere (MS) <strong>and</strong> into <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Hemisphere than<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r models. By contrast, <strong>the</strong> AER model tends to isolate supersonic emission<br />

increases in NOy <strong>and</strong> H 2 O within <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Hemisphere LS. The THINAIR <strong>and</strong><br />

LLNL models calculate a NOy perturbation from supersonic aircraft in <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

Hemisphere LS that approaches that of <strong>the</strong> GSFC model. However, <strong>the</strong>se models<br />

transport much less aircraft-enhanced NOy <strong>and</strong> H 2 O to <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Hemisphere.<br />

CSIRO model NOy <strong>and</strong> H 2 O perturbations are similar to those of LLNL, except that<br />

<strong>the</strong> maximum NOy abundance increase in <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Hemisphere LS is<br />

significantly less. The SLIMCAT model shows greater NOy <strong>and</strong> H 2 O enhancements<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/050.htm (1 von 10)08.05.2008 02:42:29<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r reports in this collection

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!