13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

The effect of sulfur emission on SAD depends on how much SO 2 is converted to small particles in <strong>the</strong> aircraft plume. Conversion of SO 2 to aerosol particles within <strong>the</strong><br />

aircraft plume was found to perturb stratospheric SAD to a much greater extent than equivalent SO 2 emissions (Weisenstein et al., 1996, 1998). Atmospheric<br />

measurements in <strong>the</strong> plume of <strong>the</strong> Concorde (Fahey et al., 1995) <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r aircraft, along with modeling studies (Danilin et al., 1997; Kärcher <strong>and</strong> Fahey, 1997; Yu <strong>and</strong><br />

Turco, 1998), suggest a minimum 10% conversion, with much larger conversion rates possible. However, near-field particle observations (as discussed in Chapters 3<br />

<strong>and</strong> 7) suggest a typical conversion of sulfur to sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ) of less than 10% with a large, yet not fully understood variability under <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>the</strong><br />

aerosol composition is H 2 SO 4 /H 2 O. Model sensitivity studies were designed to examine <strong>the</strong> full range of this uncertainty with conversion fractions of 0, 10, 50, <strong>and</strong><br />

100%.<br />

In most scenarios, <strong>the</strong> reference atmosphere is consistent with a SAD using SA0. If <strong>the</strong> HSCT scenario assumes no sulfur emissions, SA0 is used for <strong>the</strong> HSCT case<br />

as well. In some HSCT calculations, <strong>the</strong> effect of increased SAD from SO 2 emissions by aircraft is also considered, using a range of different sulfate conversion<br />

fractions (Tables 4-9 through 4-12). The additional SAD fields were constructed by calculating sulfate surface area for background <strong>and</strong> HSCT conditions using <strong>the</strong> AER<br />

microphysical model coupled to <strong>the</strong>ir 2-D CTM (Weisenstein et al., 1997). The SAD perturbation (HSCT-background) was derived in absolute units <strong>and</strong> was added to<br />

<strong>the</strong> SA0 background SAD distribution. The SA5 case assumes a 10% conversion rate for 500 HSCTs with an EI(SO 2 ) of 0.4. This case also roughly approximates a<br />

5% conversion rate, for an EI(SO 2 )=0.8, with <strong>the</strong> sulfur content of <strong>the</strong> fuel maintaining its current value. Figure 3-25 shows <strong>the</strong> annually zonally averaged perturbation<br />

of SAD (in µm 2 cm -3 ) used in <strong>the</strong> SA5 scenario. SA6 is similar to SA5 but is based on 1,000 HSCTs. A 0% conversion with EI(SO 2 )=0.4 is considered in SA7 for an<br />

aircraft fleet of 500 planes. The assumption of 50% conversion with EI(SO 2 )=0.4 is considered here in SA1 <strong>and</strong> SA2 for aircraft fleets of 500 <strong>and</strong> 1,000 planes,<br />

respectively. The assumption of 100% conversion with EI(SO 2 )=0.4 is considered in SA3 <strong>and</strong> SA4 as an upper limit. SA3 assumes 500 aircraft, whereas SA4 assumes<br />

1,000 aircraft. SAD was also computed for fleets flying 2 km lower. A summary of all SAD distributions used in <strong>the</strong>se scenarios is given in Table 4-9.<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/049.htm (11 von 13)08.05.2008 02:42:26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!