13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

Options to reduce soot emissions require changes in <strong>the</strong> combustion process (Chapter 7). Soot may be activated by H 2 SO 4 <strong>and</strong> possibly o<strong>the</strong>r exhaust species. If soot<br />

activation by H 2 SO 4 is to be avoided, fuel sulfur contents of less than 10 ppm would be required.<br />

Simulations suggest that contrails would form even without any soot <strong>and</strong> sulfur emissions by activation <strong>and</strong> freezing of background particles (Jensen et al., 1998b;<br />

Kärcher et al., 1998a). Hence, <strong>the</strong> formation of contrails cannot be avoided completely by reducing exhaust aerosol emissions. Contrails formed in plumes with fewer<br />

exhaust particles are likely to be composed of fewer <strong>and</strong> larger particles, have smaller optical depths (Schumann, 1996a), hence cause less radiative forcing. Reduced<br />

soot <strong>and</strong> sulfate particle emissions may also lead to <strong>the</strong> formation of cirrus clouds with fewer but larger particles <strong>and</strong> less radiative forcing.<br />

An increase in engine efficiency may change <strong>the</strong> global effects of contrails. Improvements in engine efficiency measured as specific fuel consumption (SFC) per unit<br />

thrust or overall efficiency, h, would reduce fuel consumption at cruise altitudes for a given amount of air traffic. Because more efficient engines increase <strong>the</strong> altitude<br />

range over which persistent contrails form (see Section 3.2.4.1 <strong>and</strong> 3.7.2), contrail frequency <strong>and</strong> cover would likely increase for a given air traffic amount. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong> number of ice crystals forming per aircraft-km would likely be reduced for lower SFC because aerosol <strong>and</strong> aerosol precursor emissions would be reduced.<br />

Fewer ice crystals could result in less radiative impact for a given amount of air traffic in altitude regions where contrails form at present. Hence, <strong>the</strong> balance of<br />

changes in contrail occurrence <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> radiative impact that would result from changes in engine efficiency depend on a variety of factors, not all of which are well<br />

known enough at present.<br />

Reducing <strong>the</strong> frequency of contrails for a given amount of air traffic could o<strong>the</strong>rwise be effected by reducing <strong>the</strong> number of flights in <strong>the</strong> humid <strong>and</strong> cold regions of <strong>the</strong><br />

upper <strong>and</strong> middle troposphere. Numerical wea<strong>the</strong>r prediction schemes may be used to predict <strong>and</strong> circumvent such regions on long-distance flights. Contrail-forming<br />

regions could also be avoided by flying at generally higher altitudes, but <strong>the</strong> climatic impact of contrails may not be reduced because of counteracting effects. For<br />

example, higher flight altitudes at low latitudes could increase contrails, possibly causing a net increase instead of a decrease in global radiative forcing by contrails. In<br />

addition, more flights in <strong>the</strong> lower stratosphere could result in enhanced aerosol <strong>and</strong> chemical impacts not related to contrails.<br />

Table of contents | Previous page | Next page<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r reports in this collection<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/041.htm (5 von 5)08.05.2008 02:42:11<br />

IPCC Homepage

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!