13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

Table 3-10: Parameters affecting future changes in aircraft-produced aerosols <strong>and</strong> cloudiness <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>irimpacts on contrails <strong>and</strong> aerosol abundance. Symbols<br />

indicate sign of change in <strong>the</strong> parameter <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> impact. Question marks indicate uncertainty in sign or importance of an impact.<br />

The symbol x indicates lack of a known or important impact.<br />

Parameter<br />

Sign of<br />

Change<br />

<strong>Global</strong> Contrail<br />

<strong>and</strong> Induced-<br />

Cirrus Coverage<br />

<strong>Global</strong> Contrail<br />

Radiative<br />

Forcing<br />

Upper troposphere temperature +? - - x<br />

Lower stratosphere temperature - x x +<br />

Humidity of lower stratosphere + x x +<br />

Humidity of upper troposphere +? + + +<br />

Tropopause altitude + + + x<br />

Number of aircraft + + + +<br />

<strong>Global</strong> aviation fuel consumption + + + +<br />

Overall efficiency of propulsion + + + x<br />

Cruise altitude at mid-latitudes + - - +<br />

Cruise altitude in <strong>the</strong> tropics + + + x<br />

Traffic in tropical regions + + + x<br />

Soot emissions -? -? -? x<br />

Fuel sulfur content -? -? -? -<br />

Fuels with higher hydrogen content +? + ? -<br />

The global distribution of radiative forcing from contrails can be estimated using a radiation<br />

transfer model, <strong>the</strong> expected contrail cover, <strong>and</strong> a realistic representation of <strong>the</strong> cloudy<br />

atmosphere <strong>and</strong> surface (Minnis et al., 1999). <strong>Global</strong> contrail cover for 1992, for example, is<br />

shown in Figure 3-16 (see Section 3.4.3). <strong>Global</strong> mean values for TOA radiative flux are<br />

summarized in Table 3-8, along with details of <strong>the</strong> calculations. As expected, SW forcing is<br />

negative <strong>and</strong> LW <strong>and</strong> net forcings are positive. All three values increase less than linearly<br />

with solar optical depth t. The resulting 1992 global distribution of TOA net forcing for t of 0.3<br />

is shown in Figure 3-21. Forcing is largest in regions of heavy air traffic, with maximum<br />

values over nor<strong>the</strong>ast France (0.71 W m-2 ) <strong>and</strong> near New York (0.58 W m-2 ). Although <strong>the</strong><br />

contrail amount is higher over <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>ast United States of America, net contrail forcing<br />

over Europe is greater because of <strong>the</strong> greater LW forcing term. The global mean net forcing<br />

for t between 0.3 <strong>and</strong> 0.5 is about 0.02 W m-2 ; <strong>the</strong> zonal mean value is largest near 40°N,<br />

with a value five times larger than <strong>the</strong> global mean.<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/040.htm (8 von 11)08.05.2008 02:42:10<br />

Aerosol<br />

Abundance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!