13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

Case<br />

Optical Depth<br />

t at 0.55 µm<br />

Net Forcing<br />

(W m -2 )<br />

Reference (models FL, M, <strong>and</strong> N) 0.52 37.1-37.2<br />

Different aspherical particles (models FL, M, <strong>and</strong> N) 0.4 22-36<br />

Parameters Range<br />

Solar zenith angle 60°-21° 0.52 37-49<br />

Ice water content (IWC) 7.2-42 mg m -3 0.2-1.0 19-51<br />

Particle diameter 10-40 µm 0.85-0.21 41-20<br />

Surface temperature 289-299 K 0.52 35-39<br />

Cloud cover/optical depth of underlying clouds 0-1 / 0-23 0.52 37-40<br />

Surface albedo 0.05-0.3 0.52 31-40<br />

Relative humidity reference - 80% 0.52 37-31<br />

Contrail vertical depth (for fixed ice water path) 200 m - 1 km 0.52 37.1-36.7<br />

Lower contrail top (for fixed IWC) 11-10 km 0.52 37-31<br />

Lower contrail top (for temperature-dependent IWC) 11-10 km 0.52-1.32 37-45<br />

a) Details in Meerkötter et al. (1999). Reference case for mid-latitude summer (McClatchey et al., 1972) as in Table 3-6; spherical particles; solar zenith angle<br />

of 60°; diurnal sunshine fraction of 50%; IWC of 21 mg m-3 ; volume mean particlediameter of 32 µm; surface temperature of 294 K; no low-level clouds;<br />

relative humidity of reference profile (McClatcheyet al., 1972) varying from 77% at <strong>the</strong> surface to 11% at 12-km altitude; contrail depth 200 m; <strong>and</strong> contrail top<br />

at 11-km altitude.<br />

Radiative forcing is defined as <strong>the</strong> net radiative flux change at some level in <strong>the</strong> atmosphere calculated in response to a perturbation, such as a change in cloud cover.<br />

The definition of radiative forcing used here is <strong>the</strong> "instantaneous" or "static" flux change at <strong>the</strong> top of <strong>the</strong> atmosphere (TOA) (IPCC, 1996) (see Chapter 6). A positive<br />

net flux change represents an energy gain, hence a net heating of <strong>the</strong> Earth system.<br />

3.6.1. Direct Radiative Impact of Aerosols<br />

The direct radiative impact of aircraft-induced aerosol is much smaller than that of volcanic stratospheric or regional tropospheric aerosol <strong>and</strong> smaller than o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

aircraft-induced radiative forcing values (see Chapter 6). Radiative forcing by aerosol depends on many parameters (Haywood <strong>and</strong> Ramaswamy, 1998). For aerosol in<br />

<strong>the</strong> size range 0.1 to 1 µm, <strong>the</strong> increase in solar reflectance (albedo effect) exceeds <strong>the</strong> trapping of terrestrial radiation (greenhouse effect), causing a surface cooling<br />

(Lacis et al., 1992, Minnis et al., 1993; Minnis et al., 1998c). Aircraft-induced aerosols could have an importance similar to that of natural stratospheric aerosol<br />

variations if <strong>the</strong>ir optical depth in <strong>the</strong> solar range were of comparable magnitude to that of natural stratospheric aerosol. The optical depth of aerosol is proportional to<br />

its column load. The maximum zonally averaged column load from soot emissions <strong>and</strong> aircraft-induced sulfuric acid is estimated (see Section 3.3) to be less than 1<br />

<strong>and</strong> 6 ng cm-2 , respectively. Small sulfuric acid particles are nonabsorbent but scatter strongly in <strong>the</strong> shortwave spectrum, with mass scattering efficiencies of 7 (4-10)<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/040.htm (2 von 11)08.05.2008 02:42:10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!