13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

Modeling studies of soot distribution in <strong>the</strong> upper troposphere <strong>and</strong> lower stratosphere differ<br />

on <strong>the</strong> importance of aircraft sources of soot. Some model simulations suggest that groundlevel<br />

sources of soot (12 Tg C yr-1 ) are as important as aircraft sources in <strong>the</strong> upper<br />

troposphere <strong>and</strong> predict maximum soot values <strong>the</strong>re [2 to 5 ng m-3 in Liousse et al. (1996)<br />

<strong>and</strong> 10 to 50 ng m-3 in Cooke <strong>and</strong> Wilson (1996)] that exceed observed values near 200<br />

hPa at nor<strong>the</strong>rn mid-latitudes (Pueschel et al., 1997). O<strong>the</strong>r model results show that current<br />

aircraft could be a noticeable source of <strong>the</strong> soot near <strong>the</strong> tropopause at nor<strong>the</strong>rn midlatitudes<br />

(Bekki, 1997; Danilin et al., 1998; Rahmes et al., 1998). Tracer simulation results<br />

from <strong>the</strong> AER 2-D model (Section 3.5.1) were multiplied by EI(soot) of 0.04 g/kg fuel<br />

(Döpelheuer, 1997) to estimate <strong>the</strong> global distribution of soot. The results (Figure 3-11)<br />

show maximum values of 0.6 ng m-3 near 12 km at nor<strong>the</strong>rn mid-latitudes. These values are<br />

in <strong>the</strong> middle of <strong>the</strong> range of o<strong>the</strong>r model results <strong>and</strong> are in <strong>the</strong> range of observed values<br />

(Figure 3-10). However, because <strong>the</strong> fleet-mean EI(soot) is uncertain <strong>and</strong> may range from<br />

0.01 to 0.1 g/kg fuel, <strong>the</strong> effective range of <strong>the</strong> maximum in Figure 3-11 is 0.15 to 1.5 ng m- 3 . At 20 km, fuel tracer simulations show aircraft-induced zonal mean soot perturbations to<br />

be approximately 100 times smaller than maximum observed values (Figure 3-10).<br />

Observations of soot in <strong>the</strong> upper troposphere <strong>and</strong> lower stratosphere are too limited to<br />

provide an estimate of any long-term changes in soot concentrations in those regions. The<br />

possible consequences of heterogeneous reactions on soot (Bekki, 1997; Lary et al., 1997)<br />

are discussed in Chapter 2.<br />

3.3.6. Polar Stratospheric Clouds <strong>and</strong> Aircraft Emissions<br />

During winter in <strong>the</strong> polar regions, low temperatures lead to <strong>the</strong> formation of polar<br />

stratospheric cloud (PSC) particles, which contain H 2 SO 4 , HNO 3 , <strong>and</strong> H 2 O (e.g., WMO,<br />

Figure 3-11: Latitude <strong>and</strong> altitude distribution of annually averaged<br />

increase in soot mass density calculated with <strong>the</strong> AER 2-D model,<br />

assuming a 1992 aircraft fuel-use scenario <strong>and</strong> a soot emission index<br />

of 0.04 g C/kg fuel. Contour values are in ng m-3 (adapted from<br />

Weisenstein et al., 1997).<br />

1995; Carslaw et al., 1997; Peter, 1997). PSCs activate chlorine, leading to significant<br />

seasonal ozone losses in <strong>the</strong> lower stratosphere, particularly in <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Hemisphere<br />

(WMO, 1995). PSC formation may be enhanced by <strong>the</strong> atmospheric accumulation of aircraft<br />

emissions of NO x , H 2 O, <strong>and</strong> sulfate, as well as through direct formation in aircraft plumes in polar regions (Section 3.2 <strong>and</strong> Chapter 4). If aircraft emissions change <strong>the</strong><br />

frequency, abundance, or composition of PSCs, <strong>the</strong> associated ozone loss may also be modified (Peter et al., 1991; Arnold et al., 1992; Considine et al., 1994; Tie et<br />

al., 1996; Del Negro et al., 1997). The effects of subsonic aircraft emissions on PSCs <strong>and</strong> stratospheric ozone are expected to be smaller than those of similar<br />

emissions from supersonic aircraft because subsonic emissions occur in <strong>the</strong> 10- to 12-km region, whereas supersonic emissions will most likely occur in <strong>the</strong> 15- to 20km<br />

region. Ambient temperatures in <strong>the</strong> 10- to 12-km region are usually too high (> 200 K) for PSCs to form with available H 2 O <strong>and</strong> HNO 3 , <strong>and</strong> ozone <strong>and</strong> total<br />

inorganic chlorine concentrations are much lower than near 20 km.<br />

The impact of <strong>the</strong> subsonic fleet on PSC formation has not been well studied. The results of <strong>the</strong> fuel tracer simulation discussed in Section 3.3.4 can be used to<br />

estimate <strong>the</strong> increase of PSC SAD as a result of aircraft emissions of H2O <strong>and</strong> NOx . Assuming an EI(H2O) of 1,230 g/kg, EI(NOx ) of 15 g/kg, complete conversion of<br />

NOx to HNO3 , <strong>and</strong> formation of NAT particles at threshold temperatures, AER model results for a 1992 subsonic fleet show an additional condensation of HNO3 on<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/037.htm (2 von 3)08.05.2008 02:42:02

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!