13.12.2012 Views

Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LETTER 2:<br />

ON LOVE<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

This letter is one of the earliest surviving works of St Maximus,<br />

written during his brief stay at the monastery of St George in Cyzicus<br />

which ended in 626 (letter 3, also to John, is in thanks for a gift to the<br />

monastery of St George). It is addressed to John the Cubicularius, a<br />

courtier in Constantinople. Like several other letters to John, it is in<br />

the second person plural, which suggests that it was written to a<br />

group (of courtiers?) in Constantinople who looked to Maximus as<br />

their spiritual father, a relationship that probably went back to<br />

Maximus’ time as a monk at Chrysopolis, just over the Bosphorus from<br />

the capital, and had maybe grown out of friendships formed when<br />

Maximus was protoasecretis in the imperial court. The letter is an<br />

encomium of love, both spendidly expressed and profound in its<br />

teaching. As Maximus’ first editor said, ‘Truly this is Maximus at his<br />

best’: vere maximum agit Maximus (PG 91:393D).<br />

It needs little introduction. But a few points might be made. First, it<br />

is archetypally Maximus in its combination of philosophical learning<br />

and quite practical, and also demanding, spiritual teaching. Maximus<br />

uses philosophical terminology to develop his understanding of love,<br />

most strikingly, perhaps, in the very abstract definition of love he<br />

provides (401D). But his teaching is quite practical: however splendid<br />

a concept love is, its touchstone is care for one’s neighbour (401D).<br />

Second, Maximus’ teaching here is, compared with his later teaching,<br />

incautiously expressed: he uses language, about there being one will<br />

between God and human beings, that he will later retract (see 396C<br />

and n. 6). Finally, nonetheless, we find here Maximus’ teaching in its<br />

characteristic breadth: at one pole is self-love, ‘the first progeny of the<br />

devil and the mother of all passions’ (397C), which cuts the human<br />

being off from God and from other human beings; at the other pole is<br />

deifying love, that breaks down all barriers, and transfigures the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!