13.12.2012 Views

Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

44 INTRODUCTION<br />

necessity of ascetic struggle, if we are to make any progress towards<br />

God.<br />

In this Difficulty, and elsewhere, there is another more general<br />

difference from the presentation of ascetic theology found in the<br />

earlier works. We have already noted that Evagrius, and following him<br />

Maximus, develops a classification of the passions based on a broadly<br />

Platonic analysis of the make-up of the human soul. At several points<br />

in Difficulty 10, we find Maximus developing a quite elaborate<br />

analysis of the soul, its manner of operation and its relation to the<br />

body. He prefaces his extended treatment of the Transfiguration and<br />

all that in the Old Testament foreshadowed that occasion with an<br />

analysis of the way the soul operates (Amb. 10.2–3). Later on there is<br />

a detailed analysis of the passionate part of the soul (Amb. 10.44).<br />

Both these analyses are drawn, quite directly, from a work by<br />

Nemesius, fourth-century Bishop of Emesa, called On human nature.<br />

As we saw earlier, the point of such analysis is diagnostic: an<br />

understanding of how the soul is affected by the passions will help in<br />

overcoming, or sublimating, them. The source of this analysis in<br />

Evagrius and the early Maximus is mainly a kind of practical wisdom<br />

worked out by the Desert Fathers and their successors (though we<br />

have already noticed some philosophical borrowing); in the Ambigua<br />

(and also in several of the opuscula) such analysis is drawn from the<br />

Greek philosophical tradition (especially from Nemesius, who seems<br />

to have been something of a favourite with Maximus, and later with<br />

St John Damascene). Such a drawing together of ascetic wisdom and<br />

the inheritance of Classical and Hellenistic philosophy is also<br />

something that, through Maximus, becomes characteristic of later<br />

Byzantine theology.<br />

Difficulty 10 presents the most extended discussion of Maximian<br />

theology in a single treatise, covering as it does Trinitarian theology<br />

and Christology, the doctrine of creation and providence, the<br />

relationship between the two Testaments, the nature of the soul’s<br />

ascent to God, and much else—all focused on the event of the<br />

Transfiguration of Christ. 18 In focusing on the Transfiguration,<br />

Maximus was picking up an already existing tradition in monastic<br />

spirituality: it is already found in the Macarian Homilies, 19 and was<br />

destined to become very important to the fourteenth-century<br />

hesychasts. But it is found elsewhere in Maximus himself, in the<br />

second of his Centuries on Theology and the Incarnate Dispensation. It<br />

is perhaps worth quoting, as it provides a sketch of the central part of<br />

Difficulty 10.<br />

the Lord does not always appear in glory to all who stand<br />

before Him. To beginners He appears in the form of a servant (cf.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!