Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

13.12.2012 Views

MAXIMUS’ SPIRITUAL THEOLOGY 41 aim of ascetic struggle, but only so that, in their purified state, they can be reincorporated in the whole human being, itself consumed by a passionate love for God. It is not so much detachment, as sublimation: When the human intellect is constantly with God, the desire grows beyond all measure into an intense longing for God and the incensiveness is completely transformed into divine love. For by continual participation in the divine radiance his intellect becomes totally filled with light; and when it has reintegrated its passible aspect, it redirects this aspect towards God, as we have said, filling it with an incomprehensible and intense longing for Him and with unceasing love, thus drawing it entirely away from worldly things to the divine. (CC II.48) The irrational parts of the soul are not cut off, when the intellect is with God, rather they are sublimated: desire into divine erôs and the incensive part into divine agapê. In this treatment of apatheia, which distinguishes it utterly from any form of indifference, and sees it as a state embracing the lower parts of the soul, we again detect an affinity with Diadochus of Photikê who uses the arresting imagery of the ‘fire of apatheia’. 16 THEOLOGY AND CONTEMPLATION There is a similar radical rethinking of Evagrian material in Maximus’ understanding of the experience of the intellect in its transition from the state of natural contemplation that to tbeologia, contemplation of God Himself. Both Maximus and Evagrius use the notion of ‘mere thoughts’ (psila noêmata) to elucidate what is involved. But though they use the same term, they use it in almost completely different ways. For Evagrius ‘mere thoughts’ are what we strive to escape from, whereas for Maximus they are the sign of the beginnings of natural contemplation. This is, I think, because for Evagrius the passage from natural contemplation to theologia is defined almost entirely in terms of a growing simplification: mere thoughts (that is, thoughts uncorrupted by passion) are the product of apatheia, and characteristic of the stage of contemplation. But it is their plurality that strikes Evagrius: their multiplicity distracts the intellect from the simplicity of God. The intellect is to rise above ‘mere thoughts’ to a single simple thought in which it knows God. Maximus’ treatment is different, because his main concern is the purification of love. ‘Mere thoughts’ are the way in which we apprehend the world around us, when we have attained the state of apatheia: ‘if the thoughts

42 INTRODUCTION that continually rise up in the heart are free from passion whether the body is awake or asleep, then we may know that we have attained the highest state of dispassion’ (CCI.93). Such thoughts are ‘mere’, as we have seen, because our passions are caught up with God, and so these thoughts are no longer the stimulus for possessive passions. ‘Mere thoughts’, then, for Maximus are a sign of that detachment that enables us to engage in the world and with others in a non-possessive way—with respect. The term for Maximus is not essentially plural, as it is for Evagrius: for Maximus it is the fact that such thoughts are no longer ‘impassioned’ that is important. ECSTATIC LOVE There is another reason why Maximus differs from Evagrius in his understanding of the higher reaches of the life of contemplation: it is again related to his perception that the passage from contemplation to theologia is to be understood in terms of love, rather than in terms of simplicity. For here he introduces a theme from Denys the Areopagite: that in its final union with God the intellect is taken out of itself—its love is ‘ecstatic’ (the Greek means ‘standing outside oneself). In the Centuries on Theology and the Incarnate Dispensation, Maximus gives an interpretation of the stages of apatheia in terms of the sequence: sabbath-sabbaths-sabbaths of sabbaths: 17 The sabbath signifies the dispassion of the deiform soul that through practice of the virtues has utterly cast off the marks of sin. Sabbaths signify the freedom of the deiform soul that through the spiritual contemplation of created nature has quelled even the natural activity of sense-perception. Sabbaths of sabbaths signify the spiritual calm of the deiform soul that has withdrawn the intellect even from contemplation of all the divine principles in created beings, that through an ecstasy of love has clothed it entirely in God alone, and that through mystical theology has brought it altogether to rest in God. (CT I.37–9) Elsewhere he speaks of the intellect attaining ‘through unknowing the very principle of divine unity’ (CT II.8). By following Denys in seeing the union of the soul with God in terms of ecstatic love in a union of unknowing, Maximus is enabled to carry through his understanding of the Christian life in terms of the perfection of love right to the end.

MAXIMUS’ SPIRITUAL THEOLOGY 41<br />

aim of ascetic struggle, but only so that, in their purified state, they<br />

can be reincorporated in the whole human being, itself consumed by a<br />

passionate love for God. It is not so much detachment, as sublimation:<br />

When the human intellect is constantly with God, the desire<br />

grows beyond all measure into an intense longing for God and<br />

the incensiveness is completely transformed into divine love. For<br />

by continual participation in the divine radiance his intellect<br />

becomes totally filled with light; and when it has reintegrated its<br />

passible aspect, it redirects this aspect towards God, as we have<br />

said, filling it with an incomprehensible and intense longing for<br />

Him and with unceasing love, thus drawing it entirely away from<br />

worldly things to the divine.<br />

(CC II.48)<br />

The irrational parts of the soul are not cut off, when the intellect is<br />

with God, rather they are sublimated: desire into divine erôs and the<br />

incensive part into divine agapê. In this treatment of apatheia,<br />

which distinguishes it utterly from any form of indifference, and sees<br />

it as a state embracing the lower parts of the soul, we again detect an<br />

affinity with Diadochus of Photikê who uses the arresting imagery of<br />

the ‘fire of apatheia’. 16<br />

THEOLOGY AND CONTEMPLATION<br />

There is a similar radical rethinking of Evagrian material in<br />

Maximus’ understanding of the experience of the intellect in its<br />

transition from the state of natural contemplation that to tbeologia,<br />

contemplation of God Himself. Both Maximus and Evagrius use the<br />

notion of ‘mere thoughts’ (psila noêmata) to elucidate what is<br />

involved. But though they use the same term, they use it in almost<br />

completely different ways. For Evagrius ‘mere thoughts’ are what we<br />

strive to escape from, whereas for Maximus they are the sign of the<br />

beginnings of natural contemplation. This is, I think, because for<br />

Evagrius the passage from natural contemplation to theologia is<br />

defined almost entirely in terms of a growing simplification: mere<br />

thoughts (that is, thoughts uncorrupted by passion) are the product of<br />

apatheia, and characteristic of the stage of contemplation. But it is<br />

their plurality that strikes Evagrius: their multiplicity distracts the<br />

intellect from the simplicity of God. The intellect is to rise above ‘mere<br />

thoughts’ to a single simple thought in which it knows God. Maximus’<br />

treatment is different, because his main concern is the purification of<br />

love. ‘Mere thoughts’ are the way in which we apprehend the world<br />

around us, when we have attained the state of apatheia: ‘if the thoughts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!