Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

13.12.2012 Views

MAXIMUS’ SPIRITUAL THEOLOGY 35 what is being discussed is something that takes place in the life of any Christian who strives to be faithful to his baptism (we have already noticed that one of his profoundest spiritual treatises, his second letter, translated below, was written for a courtier). Maximus himself often makes explicit that the Christian life is something that has its foundation in baptism (something not always emphasized by other monastic writers, for instance Evagrius himself). So he says in his first Century on Theology and the Incarnation: ‘Baptized in Christ through the Spirit we receive the first incorruption according to the flesh. Keeping this original incorruption spotless by giving ourselves to good works and by dying to our own will, we await the final incorruption bestowed by Christ in the Spirit’ (CT I.87). What is built on the foundation laid by baptism is something worked out by Maximus using all the resources of ascetical theology available to him. (In this emphasis on baptism he reveals his affinity with Diadochus of Photikê.) THE INFLUENCE OF EVAGRIUS What were these resources? Principally the works of Evagrius and those who followed him. There Maximus found a pattern for the stages of the spiritual life. For Evagrius sees the Christian life as passing through three stages. First there is the stage he calls praktikê, the term that classical philosophers had coined for the active life of engagement in the world in contrast to theôrêtikê, used to designate a life of intellectual activity (contemplation). Praktikê, however, for Evagrius does not mean life in the world, rather it refers to the initial stage of the spiritual life which is characterized by effort or activity, the effort of striving to follow the commandments and cultivate virtues, and of struggling against temptation—in the translations that follow, I have usually translated it ‘ascetic struggle’. Evagrius has a great deal to say about this stage of praktikê: ithas, indeed, been remarked that Evagrius’ ability is especially ‘in the field of practical piety’. 3 It is what Evagrius has to say on praktikê that was preserved in the original Greek (his more daring speculations survive only in Syriac), and it is on this that Maximus drew most heavily (though he was well aware of Evagrius’ speculative theology, and in his writings attempts to provide a metaphysical background to his ascetic theology more consonant with Christian orthodoxy). 4 The stage of praktikê is followed by that of natural contemplation (physikê, the Greek for ‘natural’): this is the beginning of contemplation, in which the purified mind is able to contemplate the natural order and understand its inner structure. This is followed by the final stage, that of theology, understood in the usual patristic sense, not as some

36 INTRODUCTION kind of academic study, but as knowledge or contemplation of God, a knowledge which is transforming, so that the mind becomes God, or is deified. The aim of ascetic struggle for Evagrius is to purify the mind and prepare it for prayer. More specifically, ascetic struggle leads to a state of apatheia, a key term in Byzantine ascetical theology, usually misunderstood in the West (from at least the time of Jerome). 5 Literally, it means ‘passionlessness’; it is often translated ‘dispassion’ (which is what I have adopted), but is best understood as a state of serenity. But ascetic struggle is understood as struggle with the passions, with moods or desires that come upon us, often obsessively, and disturb or distract us. Evagrius uses another word to describe the passions, and that is logismos, a thought, but as it is more like a train of thoughts set in motion by one or more of the passions, I have usually translated logismos by ‘train of thought’. Evagrius also speaks in this context of demons: it is the demons who stir up the trains of thought connected with the passions. According to Evagrius, there are eight logismoi, corresponding to the passions of gluttony, fornication, avarice, grief, anger, accidie or listlessness, vainglory and pride. 6 Like most of the Fathers he works with the kind of tripartition of the soul that can be traced back to Plato, the three parts being the rational part (the mind [nous], the pilot of the soul) and two irrational parts— the incensive part (to use the translation adopted here), the source of the soul’s energy, and the desiring part. This tripartition is used in his analysis of the ways in which the passions affect the soul: gluttony, fornication and avarice are passions that affect the desiring part of the soul, they are disordered desires; grief and anger affect the incensive part; vainglory and pride affect the rational part of the soul; accidie affects all three parts. The point of this analysis is diagnostic: if one understands what kind of passion one is suffering from, then one can begin to learn how to deal with it. The remedies are manifold, and often conveyed in stories (the collections of sayings of the Fathers of the Desert are largely concerned with shedding light on the stage of ascetic struggle): monastic discussion of these (not least what we find in Evagrius) manifests considerable psychological subtlety, and also an awareness of the huge variety of human types, that all need different treatment. Once freed from the passions, the mind can engage in prayer or contemplation, undistracted by the passions: the ‘flower’ of ascetic struggle, Evagrius says, is apatheia. 7 Once the soul has attained apatheia, it can begin to contemplate. This leads the soul to the second stage, that of natural contemplation. Natural contemplation is so called because at this stage the mind is able to contemplate the logoi that lie behind the natural order. In Christian usage, this notion of the logoi can be traced back to Origen: they are

MAXIMUS’ SPIRITUAL THEOLOGY 35<br />

what is being discussed is something that takes place in the life of any<br />

<strong>Christian</strong> who strives to be faithful to his baptism (we have already<br />

noticed that one of his profoundest spiritual treatises, his second<br />

letter, translated below, was written for a courtier). Maximus himself<br />

often makes explicit that the <strong>Christian</strong> life is something that has its<br />

foundation in baptism (something not always emphasized by other<br />

monastic writers, for instance Evagrius himself). So he says in his<br />

first Century on Theology and the Incarnation: ‘Baptized in Christ<br />

through the Spirit we receive the first incorruption according to the<br />

flesh. Keeping this original incorruption spotless by giving ourselves<br />

to good works and by dying to our own will, we await the final<br />

incorruption bestowed by Christ in the Spirit’ (CT I.87). What is built<br />

on the foundation laid by baptism is something worked out by<br />

Maximus using all the resources of ascetical theology available to<br />

him. (In this emphasis on baptism he reveals his affinity with<br />

Diadochus of Photikê.)<br />

THE INFLUENCE OF EVAGRIUS<br />

What were these resources? Principally the works of Evagrius and<br />

those who followed him. There Maximus found a pattern for the<br />

stages of the spiritual life. For Evagrius sees the <strong>Christian</strong> life as<br />

passing through three stages. First there is the stage he calls<br />

praktikê, the term that classical philosophers had coined for the active<br />

life of engagement in the world in contrast to theôrêtikê, used to<br />

designate a life of intellectual activity (contemplation). Praktikê,<br />

however, for Evagrius does not mean life in the world, rather it refers<br />

to the initial stage of the spiritual life which is characterized by effort<br />

or activity, the effort of striving to follow the commandments and<br />

cultivate virtues, and of struggling against temptation—in the<br />

translations that follow, I have usually translated it ‘ascetic struggle’.<br />

Evagrius has a great deal to say about this stage of praktikê: ithas,<br />

indeed, been remarked that Evagrius’ ability is especially ‘in the field<br />

of practical piety’. 3 It is what Evagrius has to say on praktikê that was<br />

preserved in the original Greek (his more daring speculations survive<br />

only in <strong>Syriac</strong>), and it is on this that Maximus drew most heavily<br />

(though he was well aware of Evagrius’ speculative theology, and in<br />

his writings attempts to provide a metaphysical background to his<br />

ascetic theology more consonant with <strong>Christian</strong> orthodoxy). 4 The stage<br />

of praktikê is followed by that of natural contemplation (physikê, the<br />

Greek for ‘natural’): this is the beginning of contemplation, in which<br />

the purified mind is able to contemplate the natural order and<br />

understand its inner structure. This is followed by the final stage,<br />

that of theology, understood in the usual patristic sense, not as some

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!