Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church
Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church
12 For the text of the edict see Schwartz (1940), 189–214; the nine anathemas appended to the edict can also be found in Denzinger and Schönmetzer (1976), 403–11. 13 Anathema 11 of Constantinople II: Tanner (1990), 119. 14 Sherwood (1952), 3; see his full analysis of Amb. 7 in Sherwood (1955a), 72–222. 15 On Messalianism and the Macarian Homilies, see Stewart (1991). 16 See the footnote, ad loc. Other allusions to the Macarian Homilies can be found by consulting the index fontium in the editions of Maximus’ works in Corpus Christianorum. Series Graeca. See the Bibliography. 17 See, e.g., Amb. 20 (1236D–1241D) and Myst. 5 (672D–684A). 18 See, e.g., Amb. 19:1236C, Myst. prologue: 660B. 19 On Maximus’ understanding of religious experience, see Miquel (1966). 20 See des Places (1966), 9–10, citing Marrou (1943). 21 The quotation is from Century on Spiritual Knowledge 5(desPlaces [1966], 86) and concerns the meaning of thelesis: Opusc. 26:277C; Dialogue with Pyrrhus [Opusc. 28], 28:301 C. 22 See des Places (1966), 66–7, and also his article in Heinzer and Schönborn (1982), 29–35. 23 See Louth (1981), 125–31. 24 On Cappadocian thought see Otis (1958), and also, more recently but hardly as succinctly, Pelikan (1993). On the influence of the Cappadocians on Maximus, see G.C.Berthold in Heinzer and Schönborn (1982), 51–9. 25 For a brief attempt to tackle this question see Louth (1993a). 26 See below, chapter 5 of the Introduction, and Amb. 41. 27 For more detail on Denys the Areopagite, see Louth (1989) and Rorem (1993). 28 See Suchla (1990), 1–91. 29 See Siddals (1983) and (1987). 30 See Louth (1986). 31 Translation from Luibheid (1987), 153f. 32 See the important paper: Gould (1989). 33 There has been considerable scholarly dispute about Maximus’ debt to the Areopagite; for further detail, see Louth (1993b). 34 See Amb. 71, below, and Andia (forthcoming). 3 MAXIMUS’ SPIRITUAL THEOLOGY NOTES 199 1 LP l. 97–106 (CCSG 23, pp. 32f.). 2 Psa. 44.3, quoted by Maximus in CT I.97 and Amb. 10.17:1128A, in reference to the transfigured Christ. 3 Bousset (1923), 304, cited by Sherwood (1955b), 235, n. 356. 4 For an introduction to Evagrius, see Louth (1981), 100–13; and for more on his influence among the Greek and the Syrians, see Guillaumont
200 NOTES (1962). For Maximus’ attempt to correct Evagrian metaphysics, see below, chapter 5 of the Introduction. 5 See Jerome, Ep. 133.3 (ed. J.Labourt, VIII, [Paris, 1963], 53). 6 To use the usual English equivalents, which are not always quite appropriate: the Greek terms are gastrimargia, porneia, philarguria, lypê, orgê, akêdia, kenodoxia, hyperêphania. 7 Evagrius, Logos Praktikos 81 (Guillaumont et al. [1971], 670). 8 Idem, ibid. 64 (Guillaumont et al. [1971], 648). 9 Evagrius, On Prayer 53 (cf. Palmer [1979], 62). 10 See Garrigues (1976), esp. 176–99; and Heinzer (1980), 181–98. 11 On the vexed question of Greek and Latin words for love, Oliver O’Donovan’s comment is pertinent: ‘It may be convenient for modern thinkers to label certain motifs by the Latin or Greek words which they think incapsulate them, but they should not then suppose they have discovered a lexicographical statute to which ancient writers can be held’ (O’Donovan [1980], 10–11). On the language of love in Plato and the Fathers, see most recently Osborne (1994). 12 CC II.8, and cf. his doctrine in Ep. 2 (397BCD). 13 Cf. also CC I.55, II.14, III.56, IV.21.60f. 14 Cf. Ep. 2:405A. 15 See, for instance, CC II.16 (definition of passion) and II.17 (definition of vice). 16 Diadochus of Photikê, Century on Spiritual Knowledge 17, cf. 72 (des Places [1966], 94, 131). 17 For ‘sabbath’, cf. Isa. 66:23; for ‘sabbaths’, cf. Exod. 31:13; for ‘sabbaths of sabbaths’, cf. Lev. 16:31 (LXX). 18 For a more detailed analysis of the bulk of this Difficulty, see chapter 5 of the Introduction, below. 19 Makarios, Hom. 15.38 (ed. H.Dörries, E.Klostermann and M.Kroeger, Patristische Texte und Studien, 4, Berlin, 1964, pp. 149f.). 4 THE DOCTRINE OF THE PERSON OF CHRIST 1 See Opusc. 20: PG 91:237CD, 244C–245A; 28:328C–329B. 2 Translation from Tanner (1990), 86–7 (slightly modified). 3 For an account of the historical development of the logos/tropos distinction and its use by Maximus, see Sherwood (1955a), 155–66; and Heinzer (1980), 29–58. 4 Gregory Nazianzen, Sermon 39.13 [PG 36:348D]. Gregory’s sermon is for the Feast of Lights, i.e., the Theophany (or the Epiphany). 5 See Andia (forthcoming). Amb. 10.31B-H makes this identification virtually explicit. 6 See Lethel (1979), esp. 31–5. 7 On this, see Heinzer (1980), 59–116. 8 Athanasius, On the Incarnation 43. 9 Gregory Nazianzen, Letter 101.32.
- Page 157 and 158: 148 DIFFICULTY 10 B D 1201A the spi
- Page 159 and 160: 150 DIFFICULTY 10 1204A B C 50 Cont
- Page 161 and 162: 152 DIFFICULTY 10 for whose sake th
- Page 163 and 164: 154 TEXTS The structure of the Diff
- Page 165 and 166: 156 TEXTS B C D no longer tied to e
- Page 167 and 168: 158 TEXTS 1312A D B C (Heb. 9:24),
- Page 169 and 170: 1316A 160 TEXTS C D earth (Col. 1:2
- Page 171 and 172: 162 TEXTS 1408C D 1409A B TEXT Of t
- Page 173 and 174: 164 TEXTS C D 1413A —we dare to t
- Page 175 and 176: 166 TEXTS B C D Another contemplati
- Page 177 and 178: 168 TEXTS B C stop the movement of
- Page 179 and 180: 170 TEXTS 1048A B C D Since, accord
- Page 181 and 182: 172 TEXTS D 1052A B C specified in
- Page 183 and 184: 174 TEXTS 1056A D B shows that what
- Page 185 and 186: 1060A 176 TEXTS C D energy, have ac
- Page 187 and 188: 178
- Page 189 and 190: 180 OPUSCULE 7 C D 72A B to his mys
- Page 191 and 192: 182 OPUSCULE 7 D 76A B C imperfect
- Page 193 and 194: 184 OPUSCULE 7 80A C B C has a natu
- Page 195 and 196: 186 OPUSCULE 7 84A C D B the revere
- Page 197 and 198: 188 OPUSCULE 7 88A C D I forbear fr
- Page 199 and 200: 190 OPUSCULE 7 B Since I have now s
- Page 201 and 202: 192 OPUSCULE 3 48A C D B Let no-one
- Page 203 and 204: 194 OPUSCULE 3 C 52A B C The purpor
- Page 205 and 206: 196 OPUSCULE 3 56A B C D the manife
- Page 207: 198 NOTES the Persians. But there s
- Page 211 and 212: 202 NOTES 9 It is perhaps worth emp
- Page 213 and 214: 204 NOTES 2 Discussed above, chapte
- Page 215 and 216: 206 NOTES 48 Cf. the Dionysian tria
- Page 217 and 218: 208 NOTES Faith 13 (Kotter [1973],
- Page 219 and 220: 210 NOTES hêmin (see On human natu
- Page 221 and 222: 212 NOTES 7 By which Maximus seems
- Page 223 and 224: 214 NOTES 13 This is a good definit
- Page 225 and 226: 216 NOTES 20 Gregory is here referr
- Page 227 and 228: 218
- Page 229 and 230: 220 BIBLIOGRAPHY Confessore, Capito
- Page 231 and 232: 222 BIBLIOGRAPHY Andia, Y.de (forth
- Page 233 and 234: 224 BIBLIOGRAPHY Marrou, H.-I. (194
- Page 235 and 236: 226
- Page 237 and 238: 228 INDEX Clément, O. 201 Coleman-
- Page 239 and 240: 230 INDEX Michael Psellus 43 Michae
- Page 241: REVELATION
12 For the text of the edict see Schwartz (1940), 189–214; the nine<br />
anathemas appended to the edict can also be found in Denzinger and<br />
Schönmetzer (1976), 403–11.<br />
13 Anathema 11 of Constantinople II: Tanner (1990), 119.<br />
14 Sherwood (1952), 3; see his full analysis of Amb. 7 in Sherwood (1955a),<br />
72–222.<br />
15 On Messalianism and the Macarian Homilies, see Stewart (1991).<br />
16 See the footnote, ad loc. Other allusions to the Macarian Homilies can<br />
be found by consulting the index fontium in the editions of Maximus’<br />
works in Corpus <strong>Christian</strong>orum. Series Graeca. See the Bibliography.<br />
17 See, e.g., Amb. 20 (1236D–1241D) and Myst. 5 (672D–684A).<br />
18 See, e.g., Amb. 19:1236C, Myst. prologue: 660B.<br />
19 On Maximus’ understanding of religious experience, see Miquel (1966).<br />
20 See des Places (1966), 9–10, citing Marrou (1943).<br />
21 The quotation is from Century on Spiritual Knowledge 5(desPlaces<br />
[1966], 86) and concerns the meaning of thelesis: Opusc. 26:277C;<br />
Dialogue with Pyrrhus [Opusc. 28], 28:301 C.<br />
22 See des Places (1966), 66–7, and also his article in Heinzer and<br />
Schönborn (1982), 29–35.<br />
23 See <strong>Louth</strong> (1981), 125–31.<br />
24 On Cappadocian thought see Otis (1958), and also, more recently but<br />
hardly as succinctly, Pelikan (1993). On the influence of the<br />
Cappadocians on Maximus, see G.C.Berthold in Heinzer and Schönborn<br />
(1982), 51–9.<br />
25 For a brief attempt to tackle this question see <strong>Louth</strong> (1993a).<br />
26 See below, chapter 5 of the Introduction, and Amb. 41.<br />
27 For more detail on Denys the Areopagite, see <strong>Louth</strong> (1989) and Rorem<br />
(1993).<br />
28 See Suchla (1990), 1–91.<br />
29 See Siddals (1983) and (1987).<br />
30 See <strong>Louth</strong> (1986).<br />
31 Translation from Luibheid (1987), 153f.<br />
32 See the important paper: Gould (1989).<br />
33 There has been considerable scholarly dispute about Maximus’ debt to<br />
the Areopagite; for further detail, see <strong>Louth</strong> (1993b).<br />
34 See Amb. 71, below, and Andia (forthcoming).<br />
3<br />
MAXIMUS’ SPIRITUAL THEOLOGY<br />
NOTES 199<br />
1 LP l. 97–106 (CCSG 23, pp. 32f.).<br />
2 Psa. 44.3, quoted by Maximus in CT I.97 and Amb. 10.17:1128A, in<br />
reference to the transfigured Christ.<br />
3 Bousset (1923), 304, cited by Sherwood (1955b), 235, n. 356.<br />
4 For an introduction to Evagrius, see <strong>Louth</strong> (1981), 100–13; and for more<br />
on his influence among the Greek and the Syrians, see Guillaumont