Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

13.12.2012 Views

12 For the text of the edict see Schwartz (1940), 189–214; the nine anathemas appended to the edict can also be found in Denzinger and Schönmetzer (1976), 403–11. 13 Anathema 11 of Constantinople II: Tanner (1990), 119. 14 Sherwood (1952), 3; see his full analysis of Amb. 7 in Sherwood (1955a), 72–222. 15 On Messalianism and the Macarian Homilies, see Stewart (1991). 16 See the footnote, ad loc. Other allusions to the Macarian Homilies can be found by consulting the index fontium in the editions of Maximus’ works in Corpus Christianorum. Series Graeca. See the Bibliography. 17 See, e.g., Amb. 20 (1236D–1241D) and Myst. 5 (672D–684A). 18 See, e.g., Amb. 19:1236C, Myst. prologue: 660B. 19 On Maximus’ understanding of religious experience, see Miquel (1966). 20 See des Places (1966), 9–10, citing Marrou (1943). 21 The quotation is from Century on Spiritual Knowledge 5(desPlaces [1966], 86) and concerns the meaning of thelesis: Opusc. 26:277C; Dialogue with Pyrrhus [Opusc. 28], 28:301 C. 22 See des Places (1966), 66–7, and also his article in Heinzer and Schönborn (1982), 29–35. 23 See Louth (1981), 125–31. 24 On Cappadocian thought see Otis (1958), and also, more recently but hardly as succinctly, Pelikan (1993). On the influence of the Cappadocians on Maximus, see G.C.Berthold in Heinzer and Schönborn (1982), 51–9. 25 For a brief attempt to tackle this question see Louth (1993a). 26 See below, chapter 5 of the Introduction, and Amb. 41. 27 For more detail on Denys the Areopagite, see Louth (1989) and Rorem (1993). 28 See Suchla (1990), 1–91. 29 See Siddals (1983) and (1987). 30 See Louth (1986). 31 Translation from Luibheid (1987), 153f. 32 See the important paper: Gould (1989). 33 There has been considerable scholarly dispute about Maximus’ debt to the Areopagite; for further detail, see Louth (1993b). 34 See Amb. 71, below, and Andia (forthcoming). 3 MAXIMUS’ SPIRITUAL THEOLOGY NOTES 199 1 LP l. 97–106 (CCSG 23, pp. 32f.). 2 Psa. 44.3, quoted by Maximus in CT I.97 and Amb. 10.17:1128A, in reference to the transfigured Christ. 3 Bousset (1923), 304, cited by Sherwood (1955b), 235, n. 356. 4 For an introduction to Evagrius, see Louth (1981), 100–13; and for more on his influence among the Greek and the Syrians, see Guillaumont

200 NOTES (1962). For Maximus’ attempt to correct Evagrian metaphysics, see below, chapter 5 of the Introduction. 5 See Jerome, Ep. 133.3 (ed. J.Labourt, VIII, [Paris, 1963], 53). 6 To use the usual English equivalents, which are not always quite appropriate: the Greek terms are gastrimargia, porneia, philarguria, lypê, orgê, akêdia, kenodoxia, hyperêphania. 7 Evagrius, Logos Praktikos 81 (Guillaumont et al. [1971], 670). 8 Idem, ibid. 64 (Guillaumont et al. [1971], 648). 9 Evagrius, On Prayer 53 (cf. Palmer [1979], 62). 10 See Garrigues (1976), esp. 176–99; and Heinzer (1980), 181–98. 11 On the vexed question of Greek and Latin words for love, Oliver O’Donovan’s comment is pertinent: ‘It may be convenient for modern thinkers to label certain motifs by the Latin or Greek words which they think incapsulate them, but they should not then suppose they have discovered a lexicographical statute to which ancient writers can be held’ (O’Donovan [1980], 10–11). On the language of love in Plato and the Fathers, see most recently Osborne (1994). 12 CC II.8, and cf. his doctrine in Ep. 2 (397BCD). 13 Cf. also CC I.55, II.14, III.56, IV.21.60f. 14 Cf. Ep. 2:405A. 15 See, for instance, CC II.16 (definition of passion) and II.17 (definition of vice). 16 Diadochus of Photikê, Century on Spiritual Knowledge 17, cf. 72 (des Places [1966], 94, 131). 17 For ‘sabbath’, cf. Isa. 66:23; for ‘sabbaths’, cf. Exod. 31:13; for ‘sabbaths of sabbaths’, cf. Lev. 16:31 (LXX). 18 For a more detailed analysis of the bulk of this Difficulty, see chapter 5 of the Introduction, below. 19 Makarios, Hom. 15.38 (ed. H.Dörries, E.Klostermann and M.Kroeger, Patristische Texte und Studien, 4, Berlin, 1964, pp. 149f.). 4 THE DOCTRINE OF THE PERSON OF CHRIST 1 See Opusc. 20: PG 91:237CD, 244C–245A; 28:328C–329B. 2 Translation from Tanner (1990), 86–7 (slightly modified). 3 For an account of the historical development of the logos/tropos distinction and its use by Maximus, see Sherwood (1955a), 155–66; and Heinzer (1980), 29–58. 4 Gregory Nazianzen, Sermon 39.13 [PG 36:348D]. Gregory’s sermon is for the Feast of Lights, i.e., the Theophany (or the Epiphany). 5 See Andia (forthcoming). Amb. 10.31B-H makes this identification virtually explicit. 6 See Lethel (1979), esp. 31–5. 7 On this, see Heinzer (1980), 59–116. 8 Athanasius, On the Incarnation 43. 9 Gregory Nazianzen, Letter 101.32.

12 For the text of the edict see Schwartz (1940), 189–214; the nine<br />

anathemas appended to the edict can also be found in Denzinger and<br />

Schönmetzer (1976), 403–11.<br />

13 Anathema 11 of Constantinople II: Tanner (1990), 119.<br />

14 Sherwood (1952), 3; see his full analysis of Amb. 7 in Sherwood (1955a),<br />

72–222.<br />

15 On Messalianism and the Macarian Homilies, see Stewart (1991).<br />

16 See the footnote, ad loc. Other allusions to the Macarian Homilies can<br />

be found by consulting the index fontium in the editions of Maximus’<br />

works in Corpus <strong>Christian</strong>orum. Series Graeca. See the Bibliography.<br />

17 See, e.g., Amb. 20 (1236D–1241D) and Myst. 5 (672D–684A).<br />

18 See, e.g., Amb. 19:1236C, Myst. prologue: 660B.<br />

19 On Maximus’ understanding of religious experience, see Miquel (1966).<br />

20 See des Places (1966), 9–10, citing Marrou (1943).<br />

21 The quotation is from Century on Spiritual Knowledge 5(desPlaces<br />

[1966], 86) and concerns the meaning of thelesis: Opusc. 26:277C;<br />

Dialogue with Pyrrhus [Opusc. 28], 28:301 C.<br />

22 See des Places (1966), 66–7, and also his article in Heinzer and<br />

Schönborn (1982), 29–35.<br />

23 See <strong>Louth</strong> (1981), 125–31.<br />

24 On Cappadocian thought see Otis (1958), and also, more recently but<br />

hardly as succinctly, Pelikan (1993). On the influence of the<br />

Cappadocians on Maximus, see G.C.Berthold in Heinzer and Schönborn<br />

(1982), 51–9.<br />

25 For a brief attempt to tackle this question see <strong>Louth</strong> (1993a).<br />

26 See below, chapter 5 of the Introduction, and Amb. 41.<br />

27 For more detail on Denys the Areopagite, see <strong>Louth</strong> (1989) and Rorem<br />

(1993).<br />

28 See Suchla (1990), 1–91.<br />

29 See Siddals (1983) and (1987).<br />

30 See <strong>Louth</strong> (1986).<br />

31 Translation from Luibheid (1987), 153f.<br />

32 See the important paper: Gould (1989).<br />

33 There has been considerable scholarly dispute about Maximus’ debt to<br />

the Areopagite; for further detail, see <strong>Louth</strong> (1993b).<br />

34 See Amb. 71, below, and Andia (forthcoming).<br />

3<br />

MAXIMUS’ SPIRITUAL THEOLOGY<br />

NOTES 199<br />

1 LP l. 97–106 (CCSG 23, pp. 32f.).<br />

2 Psa. 44.3, quoted by Maximus in CT I.97 and Amb. 10.17:1128A, in<br />

reference to the transfigured Christ.<br />

3 Bousset (1923), 304, cited by Sherwood (1955b), 235, n. 356.<br />

4 For an introduction to Evagrius, see <strong>Louth</strong> (1981), 100–13; and for more<br />

on his influence among the Greek and the Syrians, see Guillaumont

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!