13.12.2012 Views

Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

194 OPUSCULE 3<br />

C<br />

52A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

The purport therefore of Severus, and his followers, is by a<br />

certain natural diminishment to expel the assumed nature in<br />

the ineffable union, and to cover themselves with the<br />

defilement of Mani’s fantasy, 8 Apollinaris’ confusion, 9 and<br />

Eutyches’ fusion. 10 I remember, when I was staying on the<br />

island of Crete, 11 that I heard from certain false bishops of the<br />

Severan party, who disputed with me, that ‘we do not say, in<br />

accordance with the Tome of Leo, that there are two energies<br />

in Christ, because it would follow that there were two wills,<br />

and that would necessarily introduce a duality of persons, nor<br />

again do we say one energy, which might be regarded as<br />

simple, but we say, in accordance with Severus, that one will,<br />

and every divine and human energy proceeds from one and<br />

the same God the Word Incarnate.’ Against them one might<br />

angrily apply that part of the prophecy: O, O, flee from the<br />

north; in Zion you are saved, you who inhabit the daughter of<br />

Babylon. 12 From the north: that is truly the understanding of<br />

Severus, 13 a place become gloomy, and deprived of the<br />

continuance of the divine light. Daughter of Babylon: the<br />

confused teaching of false dogmas, wickedly brought forth from<br />

the most wicked habit picked up from him, which those<br />

inhabit who have turned away from the light of knowledge,<br />

and do not wish to be saved through conversion to Zion, I<br />

mean the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

For the doctrine of Severus, when examined, is opposed both<br />

to theology and to the economy. 14<br />

For if, according to him, the wills naturally follow the<br />

energies, and persons are naturally introduced by the wills, as<br />

effect follows cause (but what kind of an argument is this!),<br />

then clearly according to him there is a will for every person,<br />

and with this certainly a suitable energy is introduced. For<br />

from the principle of preserving relationships intact, it follows<br />

that there is equal reciprocity between those that are related.<br />

Since therefore what is called simply has many meanings, if<br />

the wills that are introduced by reciprocity between the<br />

persons are natural, then, according to Severus, the blessed<br />

monad will also be a triad of natures, but if they are gnomic,<br />

they will certainly disagree with each other and there will be<br />

no coming together of wills, as in a triad of persons, and<br />

certainly, if there is one will of the triad beyond being, there<br />

will be a Godhead with three names and a single person. 15 And<br />

again, if on Severus’ premiss will follows energy, by this the<br />

person will be introduced, and necessarily the energy will be<br />

destroyed, and the will that follows it will be destroyed, too, as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!