Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church
Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church
Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
194 OPUSCULE 3<br />
C<br />
52A<br />
B<br />
C<br />
The purport therefore of Severus, and his followers, is by a<br />
certain natural diminishment to expel the assumed nature in<br />
the ineffable union, and to cover themselves with the<br />
defilement of Mani’s fantasy, 8 Apollinaris’ confusion, 9 and<br />
Eutyches’ fusion. 10 I remember, when I was staying on the<br />
island of Crete, 11 that I heard from certain false bishops of the<br />
Severan party, who disputed with me, that ‘we do not say, in<br />
accordance with the Tome of Leo, that there are two energies<br />
in Christ, because it would follow that there were two wills,<br />
and that would necessarily introduce a duality of persons, nor<br />
again do we say one energy, which might be regarded as<br />
simple, but we say, in accordance with Severus, that one will,<br />
and every divine and human energy proceeds from one and<br />
the same God the Word Incarnate.’ Against them one might<br />
angrily apply that part of the prophecy: O, O, flee from the<br />
north; in Zion you are saved, you who inhabit the daughter of<br />
Babylon. 12 From the north: that is truly the understanding of<br />
Severus, 13 a place become gloomy, and deprived of the<br />
continuance of the divine light. Daughter of Babylon: the<br />
confused teaching of false dogmas, wickedly brought forth from<br />
the most wicked habit picked up from him, which those<br />
inhabit who have turned away from the light of knowledge,<br />
and do not wish to be saved through conversion to Zion, I<br />
mean the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
For the doctrine of Severus, when examined, is opposed both<br />
to theology and to the economy. 14<br />
For if, according to him, the wills naturally follow the<br />
energies, and persons are naturally introduced by the wills, as<br />
effect follows cause (but what kind of an argument is this!),<br />
then clearly according to him there is a will for every person,<br />
and with this certainly a suitable energy is introduced. For<br />
from the principle of preserving relationships intact, it follows<br />
that there is equal reciprocity between those that are related.<br />
Since therefore what is called simply has many meanings, if<br />
the wills that are introduced by reciprocity between the<br />
persons are natural, then, according to Severus, the blessed<br />
monad will also be a triad of natures, but if they are gnomic,<br />
they will certainly disagree with each other and there will be<br />
no coming together of wills, as in a triad of persons, and<br />
certainly, if there is one will of the triad beyond being, there<br />
will be a Godhead with three names and a single person. 15 And<br />
again, if on Severus’ premiss will follows energy, by this the<br />
person will be introduced, and necessarily the energy will be<br />
destroyed, and the will that follows it will be destroyed, too, as