13.12.2012 Views

Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

77A<br />

D<br />

B<br />

TEXTS 183<br />

quite other than our nature and completely foreign to it,<br />

indeed, utterly unknown: it existed with him from the<br />

beginning, and descending from above it came down with him,<br />

which is clearly what they think happened. 12 But why then did<br />

the descent to us take place? For we do not come close to him<br />

through his assumption of the holy flesh and hypostatic union<br />

with it, if it is not taken from us. The whole thing is an unreal<br />

delusion, a mere form deceiving the senses, and not the<br />

substance of flesh, nor the first-fruits of our race, unifying by<br />

grace the whole lump, 13 and dissolving all the divisions<br />

introduced by the transgression of the old Adam, through<br />

which nature has been condemned to death.<br />

Why do they begrudge us a perfect salvation and a perfect<br />

confession? Why do they direct against us syllogisms from<br />

which there is no escape, and assert that wills follow from<br />

energies, and that with this there follows contradiction, from<br />

which they introduce wills that conflict. Why should I omit to<br />

refute these charges? From where, and how, do they get these<br />

arguments? Why do they want to learn and enquire about only<br />

one thing, as if this were the only thing that mattered, and<br />

bring in the new Ecthesis, 14 imposing it involuntarily, and<br />

introducing force? Then, if they introduce the will after the<br />

action, since there was certainly no will before, where does it<br />

come from? And who is forced to have the will of the one who<br />

performed the action, so that what is done is done against his<br />

will, and acquiesced in contrary to his purpose? How again, if<br />

the Word made flesh does not himself will naturally as a<br />

human being and perform things in accordance with nature,<br />

how can he willingly undergo hunger and thirst, labour and<br />

weariness, sleep and all the rest? For the Word does not<br />

simply will and perform these things in accordance with the<br />

infinite nature beyond being that he has together with the<br />

Father and the Son, for as the divine teacher of Nyssa, the<br />

great Gregory, says, ‘with divine authority, he gives the nature<br />

time, when it wishes, to perform what belongs to itself.’ 15 For<br />

if it is only as God that he wills these things, and not as<br />

himself being a human being, then either the body has become<br />

divine by nature, or the Word has changed its nature and<br />

become flesh by loss of its own Godhead, or the flesh is not at<br />

all in itself endowed with a rational soul, but is in itself<br />

completely lifeless and irrational.<br />

If, then, [his humanity] has a rational soul, then it possesses<br />

the natural will. For everything that is rational by nature,<br />

certainly also possesses a will by nature. If then, as man, he

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!