Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

13.12.2012 Views

D 1196A B TEXTS 145 43 Contemplation of passage beyond the material dyad I understand the Saints to say that passing beyond the material dyad, 119 on account of the unity the mind perceives in the Trinity, means to find oneself beyond matter and form, in which bodies consist, or beyond flesh and matter, for only those who set these aside are worthy of being assimilated to God and united to the most pure light, that is to say those who have set aside the relationship of the soul to the flesh, and through the flesh to matter —or, to put it more generally, those who have put off the natural conformity of sensible being with what can be perceived through the senses and genuinely acquired a desire for God alone, on account, as I said, of the unity the mind perceives in the Trinity. For they know that the soul is a middle being between God and matter and has powers that can unite it with both, that is, it has a mind that links it with God and senses that link it with matter. When they have completely shaken off the senses and everything perceived through them by means of the activity that relates and inclines it to them, their soul can be ineffably assimilated to God by means of the mind alone, and wholly united to him alone ineffably, so that possessing the image of the archetype according to the likeness in mind and reason and spirit, 120 they can behold the resemblance so far as is possible, and learn in a hidden manner the unity understood in the Trinity. Or perhaps the teacher called the incensive and desiring parts [of the soul] the material dyad, because they are powers of the soul that incline towards matter and together form the passionate part of the soul and struggle against the rational part, and can scatter the mind into multiplicity, unless from the beginning it is skilfully compelled to submit to [the mind’s] yoke. And if anyone can overcome these powers and force them, as they ought, to support the mind, by yoking them like a slave to the power of reason, or if anyone can completely set them aside, and if alone through reason and contemplation cleave to the unwavering enchantment of knowledge that operates through love, and be drawn to the movement of that power, most masculine in desire, that is one and single and pure of all multiplicity and simple and undivided (for philosophers know that in God there is stability in identity of eternal movement), then such a one is truly blessed. He has attained not only true and blessed union with the Holy

146 DIFFICULTY 10 C D 1197A Trinity, but also the unity that the mind perceives in the Holy Trinity. He has become potentially simple and undivided and of a single form compared with that which is in essence simple and undivided. And he imitates so far as is possible through the habit of the virtues the goodness he thus possesses, and has put aside the individuality of the naturally separated powers because of the grace of the united God. 44 Exposition of the passionate part of the soul 121 For the passionate part of the soul is divided, they say, into that which is obedient to reason and that which cannot be persuaded by it. That which cannot be persuaded by it is divided into the nourishing part, which some call the natural, and the natural part, which some call the living part—neither of these can be persuaded to be led by reason. It is called ‘not obedient to reason’, since it is not naturally led by reason. For to grow, and to be healthy, and to live is not within our power. 122 That which is obedient to reason is divided into two: the desiring and the incensive. They call it ‘obedient to reason’, since it is natural in those who are serious 123 to be led by and to submit oneself to reason. Again the desiring part is divided into pleasure and grief. Desire that attains its object works pleasure, desire that fails of its object works grief. And again they say that desire can be divided in another way, making four kinds together with itself: desire, pleasure, fear and grief. And since everything that is is either good or evil, and either present or to come, a good that is anticipated is called desire, one that is present pleasure, and again an evil anticipated is called fear, and one present called grief. And in another way what is good can either be really so or simply be thought to be so, and this gives pleasure and desire, and in the case of evils grief and fear. And again they divide grief into four: distress, depression, envy and mercy. And they say distress is grief that causes speechlessness in those whom it affects, because of the depths into which it drags down the rational part; depression is grief that weighs down and causes annoyance at unwanted circumstances; envy is grief at another’s goods; mercy is grief at another’s evils. And they say that all grief is in its own nature an evil. For even if one who is serious grieves at another’s evils, in mercy, this is not his primary intention and a matter of deliberate purpose, but rather a reaction to circumstances. The contemplative endures

146 DIFFICULTY 10<br />

C<br />

D<br />

1197A<br />

Trinity, but also the unity that the mind perceives in the Holy<br />

Trinity. He has become potentially simple and undivided and<br />

of a single form compared with that which is in essence simple<br />

and undivided. And he imitates so far as is possible through<br />

the habit of the virtues the goodness he thus possesses, and<br />

has put aside the individuality of the naturally separated<br />

powers because of the grace of the united God.<br />

44<br />

Exposition of the passionate part of the soul 121<br />

For the passionate part of the soul is divided, they say, into<br />

that which is obedient to reason and that which cannot be<br />

persuaded by it. That which cannot be persuaded by it is<br />

divided into the nourishing part, which some call the natural,<br />

and the natural part, which some call the living part—neither<br />

of these can be persuaded to be led by reason. It is called ‘not<br />

obedient to reason’, since it is not naturally led by reason. For<br />

to grow, and to be healthy, and to live is not within our<br />

power. 122 That which is obedient to reason is divided into two:<br />

the desiring and the incensive. They call it ‘obedient to<br />

reason’, since it is natural in those who are serious 123 to be led<br />

by and to submit oneself to reason. Again the desiring part is<br />

divided into pleasure and grief. Desire that attains its object<br />

works pleasure, desire that fails of its object works grief. And<br />

again they say that desire can be divided in another way,<br />

making four kinds together with itself: desire, pleasure, fear<br />

and grief. And since everything that is is either good or evil,<br />

and either present or to come, a good that is anticipated is<br />

called desire, one that is present pleasure, and again an evil<br />

anticipated is called fear, and one present called grief. And in<br />

another way what is good can either be really so or simply be<br />

thought to be so, and this gives pleasure and desire, and in the<br />

case of evils grief and fear. And again they divide grief into four:<br />

distress, depression, envy and mercy. And they say distress is<br />

grief that causes speechlessness in those whom it affects,<br />

because of the depths into which it drags down the rational<br />

part; depression is grief that weighs down and causes<br />

annoyance at unwanted circumstances; envy is grief at<br />

another’s goods; mercy is grief at another’s evils. And they say<br />

that all grief is in its own nature an evil. For even if one who is<br />

serious grieves at another’s evils, in mercy, this is not his<br />

primary intention and a matter of deliberate purpose, but<br />

rather a reaction to circumstances. The contemplative endures

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!