Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church Andrew Louth - Syriac Christian Church

13.12.2012 Views

1105C interpretation of the Dionysian opposition of cataphatic and apophatic theology. 2 Then after a couple of meditations on the final consummation (implicit in the Transfiguration itself, and especially in St Luke’s mentioning that the prophets spoke to Christ of the ‘exodus’ he was to accomplish in Jerusalem: Luke 9:31), there follows a long series of discussions of metaphysical topics concerned with God’s relationship to the cosmos, in particular, his providence (sections 34–42). On the one hand, these sections are heavily dependent on a work by the fourth-century Nemesius, Bishop of Emesa, and on the other, they are picked up by a seventh/eighth century Palestinian monk, St John of Damascus, in his summary of Orthodox Theology, called the Exposition of the Faith. Providence, in particular, was a major concern of Byzantine theology, and Maximus takes his place in a long line of reflection on this topic. In section 43, Maximus seems to remember that the text from Gregory that was the occasion of this Difficulty also had difficult words about passing beyond the material dyad to the Trinity. Already in his metaphysical section he had discussed the monad and the dyad (section 41), and it is a topic that engaged him elsewhere (e.g., Amb. 1, from the later set of Difficulties, translated below). His concluding sections return to further analysis of the soul that is important for understanding ascetic struggle, the necessary foundation of any transfiguring vision of God: this is explored in several meditations on passages from the Old Testament, and two from the Gospels. This very long Difficulty is divided up into sections with headings both in the text as given in Migne’s Patrologia Graeca and also in Eriugena’s translation. I have kept these sections, mainly using the more concise headings given by Eriugena in his index. 3 D TEXT From the same sermon: TEXTS 93 If therefore it happens to anyone that, passing by means of reason and contemplation through matter and the fleshly, whether called cloud or veil, to become assimilated to God and united to the most pure light, so far as is permitted to human nature, this person is blessed by his ascent from here and his deification there, which is granted to those who genuinely live the philosophical life and transcend the material dyad through the unity the mind perceives in the Trinity. 4

94 DIFFICULTY 10 1108A B C 1 Introduction I do not think that I possess defectively the word of the teacher handed down about the virtue of the Saints, and if, as you wrote, there are some who think this, saying that the divine philosophy belongs to those who pass over by reason and contemplation alone without ascetic struggle, I on the contrary dare to define as solely the truly fully satisfactory philosophy that true judgment concerning reality and activity, supported by ascetic struggle, or rather I undertake to introduce reason, manifested as correcting [philosophy] by reason and contemplation, as ascetic struggle is certainly connected to reason, and the judgment it involves embraced by contemplation. For the movement of the body is ordered by reason, which by correct thinking restrains, as by a bridle, any turning aside towards what is out of place, and the rational and sensible choice of what is thought and judged is reckoned to contemplation, like a most radiant light manifesting truth itself through true knowledge. By these two especially every philosophical virtue is created and protected and by them is manifest through the body, though not wholly. For philosophy is not limited by a body, since it has the character of divine power, but it has certain shadowy reflections, in those who have been stripped through the grace of philosophy to become imitators of the godlike conduct of God-loving men. Through participation in the Good they too have put off the shamefulness of evil to become worthy of being portions of God, through assistance they needed from those empowered, and having received it they make manifest in the body through ascetic struggle the virtuous disposition that is hidden in the depth of the soul. So they become all things to all men and in all things make present to all the providence of God, and thus are a credit to the God-loving men. If there were no-one who needed to suffer or stood in need of an example to show him what virtue was, everyone would be completely sufficient for himself and arrayed with the graces of the virtues in his soul. But it is not absurd to say that this is not the case apart from such virtues being demonstrated manifestly through the body. He who acquires comprehension devoutly through contemplation, it is as if he possessed reality, with a rational will defining the reason of things accurately and correctly, keeping the judgment for himself, or

94 DIFFICULTY 10<br />

1108A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

1<br />

Introduction<br />

I do not think that I possess defectively the word of the<br />

teacher handed down about the virtue of the Saints, and if, as<br />

you wrote, there are some who think this, saying that the<br />

divine philosophy belongs to those who pass over by reason<br />

and contemplation alone without ascetic struggle, I on the<br />

contrary dare to define as solely the truly fully satisfactory<br />

philosophy that true judgment concerning reality and activity,<br />

supported by ascetic struggle, or rather I undertake to<br />

introduce reason, manifested as correcting [philosophy] by<br />

reason and contemplation, as ascetic struggle is certainly<br />

connected to reason, and the judgment it involves embraced by<br />

contemplation. For the movement of the body is ordered by<br />

reason, which by correct thinking restrains, as by a bridle,<br />

any turning aside towards what is out of place, and the<br />

rational and sensible choice of what is thought and judged is<br />

reckoned to contemplation, like a most radiant light<br />

manifesting truth itself through true knowledge. By these two<br />

especially every philosophical virtue is created and protected<br />

and by them is manifest through the body, though not wholly.<br />

For philosophy is not limited by a body, since it has the<br />

character of divine power, but it has certain shadowy<br />

reflections, in those who have been stripped through the grace<br />

of philosophy to become imitators of the godlike conduct of<br />

God-loving men. Through participation in the Good they too<br />

have put off the shamefulness of evil to become worthy of<br />

being portions of God, through assistance they needed from<br />

those empowered, and having received it they make manifest<br />

in the body through ascetic struggle the virtuous disposition<br />

that is hidden in the depth of the soul. So they become all<br />

things to all men and in all things make present to all the<br />

providence of God, and thus are a credit to the God-loving men.<br />

If there were no-one who needed to suffer or stood in need of<br />

an example to show him what virtue was, everyone would be<br />

completely sufficient for himself and arrayed with the graces<br />

of the virtues in his soul. But it is not absurd to say that this is<br />

not the case apart from such virtues being demonstrated<br />

manifestly through the body. He who acquires comprehension<br />

devoutly through contemplation, it is as if he possessed<br />

reality, with a rational will defining the reason of things<br />

accurately and correctly, keeping the judgment for himself, or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!