COVER 1 - NMHBA SUMMER 2017 low res
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
y Diane M. Ciarloni<br />
The wheels of change turn s<strong>low</strong>ly<br />
at the American Quarter Horse<br />
Association (AQHA). Very. S<strong>low</strong>ly.<br />
Remember what we fondly referred<br />
to as the “high white” rule? It stated a<br />
horse with too much white (X-number<br />
of inches) could not be accepted for<br />
AQHA registration. Some of those same<br />
horses pursued a Paint Horse Association<br />
registration, only to be told they didn’t<br />
have enough white. As a <strong>res</strong>ult, a handful<br />
wandered in a strange, no-man’s land of<br />
identity crisis. The “reason” for the rule?<br />
Something about p<strong>res</strong>erving the integrity<br />
of the breed. One string of words thrown<br />
out by AQHA went something like: “How<br />
would you like it if a horse with white<br />
going way above his knees won the All<br />
American Futurity?”<br />
Huh?<br />
One past AQHA p<strong>res</strong>ident <strong>res</strong>ponded,<br />
“Very happy if that horse’s papers carried<br />
my name as the owner.”<br />
The rule finally became less <strong>res</strong>trictive,<br />
with no diminishment of breed integrity.<br />
And what about the cryptorchid<br />
nonsense? That was the rule that said all<br />
stud horses must have two descended<br />
testicles. Talk about getting personal, all<br />
in the name of breed integrity. This issue<br />
bounced round and round and back and<br />
forth for years. Then, during a meeting at<br />
one of the AQHA conventions, the iconic<br />
trainer Bubba “Charles” Cascio sprang<br />
from his chair, unrecognized, and cut<br />
quickly to the chase.<br />
“Look,” he said, “if somebody brings a<br />
good-looking, well bred colt to my barn and<br />
asks me to train him, I won’t get down on<br />
the ground and check how many nuts he<br />
has. I’m just gonna’ start training on him.”<br />
That perspective simplified the issue<br />
and, before too much time passed, the<br />
rule was altered and, once again, the<br />
integrity of the breed suffered no negative<br />
repercussions.<br />
Things became a bit more radical in<br />
1997 when the association approved<br />
shipped semen. A wave of widespread<br />
mumbling and grumbling washed across<br />
the Quarter Horse industry. Many<br />
farms, especially the larger ones, fretted<br />
over losing the often high-dollar board<br />
and vet bills for ma<strong>res</strong> booked to their<br />
stallions. Others contended the extra labor<br />
required for shipping would cancel out the<br />
potential profits. Most of the concerns,<br />
when brought to their <strong>low</strong>est common<br />
denominator, could be simmered down<br />
to just three one-syllable words – Fear of<br />
Change.<br />
The passage of time proved most<br />
of the reluctance to embrace the new<br />
technological breeding liberty was, indeed,<br />
unfounded. If anything, al<strong>low</strong>ing shipped<br />
semen expanded significantly the mare<br />
owners’ options. The 20-year-old stakes<br />
winning/producing mare who was a risky<br />
traveler, could remain comfortably bedded<br />
down in her familiar Texas stall, while<br />
waiting for First Down Dash semen to<br />
arrive from California.<br />
Stallion owners quickly learned whether or<br />
not their studs’ semen stood up to the rigors<br />
of shipping. If it arrived at its destination with<br />
a <strong>low</strong>, living sperm count, chances were very<br />
good that particular stallion would not be<br />
a member of the shipped semen club. They<br />
could, however, be back in the long-distance<br />
business in 2001 when the AQHA approved<br />
frozen semen.<br />
It’s readily apparent that both shipped<br />
and frozen semen could very easily mess<br />
with the breed integrity issue that is one<br />
of the AQHA’s constant concerns. There<br />
was, however, some serious hanky-panky<br />
stinking up the breeding industry before<br />
the advent of shipped/frozen semen.<br />
Just how serious was that hanky-panky?<br />
Serious enough for AQHA to take the<br />
ol’ bull by the horns and implement new<br />
rules and requirements that didn’t set very<br />
well with many industry members.<br />
The problem <strong>res</strong>ted in a number of<br />
horses who were not who their papers said<br />
they were. There were instances of ma<strong>res</strong><br />
being booked to Stalllion A, sent to the<br />
farm where that stallion stood, only to be<br />
bred with semen from Stallion B instead<br />
of Stallion A. It was Stallion A’s name,<br />
however, that appeared on the <strong>res</strong>ulting<br />
offspring’s registration papers.<br />
Was the “mis-breeding” an honest<br />
mistake?<br />
Sometimes.<br />
Was the “mis-breeding” intentional?<br />
Sometimes.<br />
The ramifications of these “mis-<br />
20 New Mexico Horse Breeder