11.07.2017 Views

Spaces Vol 1 Is 6

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HERITAGE<br />

Photo: Raju Roka, 2004<br />

Above: The original fabric in the back facade<br />

was hidden below newly added layer of<br />

precast cement mesh.<br />

Photo: Raju Roka, 2004<br />

Left: A 1:1 scaled drawing of the tympanum<br />

was prepared with reference to the historic<br />

photographs.<br />

Below: The completed tympanum being<br />

washed before installation.<br />

Photo: Raju Roka, 2004<br />

of the Trust in close association with the<br />

Department of Archaeology and<br />

Kathmandu Metropolitan City.<br />

CONSERVATION ISSUES /STRATEGIES<br />

The historic buildings and monuments<br />

in Kathmandu Valley present a number<br />

of serious challenges regarding questions<br />

of historic material retention, authenticity<br />

and especially justification of replacement<br />

of carvings or fabric. Kal Bhairav is a<br />

representation of these monuments as<br />

it was a palimpsest of layers including<br />

the earthquake rebuilding, votive<br />

offerings and incomplete historic details.<br />

Historical photographs (Kurt Boeck’s<br />

photo 1890, Ganesh Photo Lab<br />

photograph of before and after the<br />

earthquake) provided nearly all that is<br />

known about the evolution of this layer.<br />

Of great interest is the fact that these<br />

photographs, which span from 1890 to<br />

1934, document the same architectural<br />

facade with no changes! The shrine thus<br />

survived the earthquake without major<br />

damage. A subsequent rebuilding<br />

between 1936 and 1991 did however<br />

greatly simplify this facade, while also<br />

adding depth to the structure through the<br />

addition of a new back wall. This was<br />

most likely done as structural<br />

reinforcement. The votive offering made<br />

in 1991, which is well documented, clad<br />

the entire architectural frame in marble<br />

tiles and added a concrete framesupported<br />

roof to cover the shrine. This<br />

cladding concealed the changes to the<br />

shrine’s architectural frame during the<br />

initial studies of the building. In<br />

preliminary work investigations, prime<br />

concern was on the extent of damage<br />

done on the underlying stone fabric by<br />

the addition of marble tiles laid in cement<br />

34 SEP-OCT 2005 SPACES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!