13.12.2012 Views

XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs

XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs

XII - 12th International Symposium - Digestive Physiology of Pigs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Digestive</strong><br />

<strong>Physiology</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Pigs</strong><br />

subtilis C-3102 (C-3102), on health and productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

sows and their litters. The study was performed in a farrowto-finish<br />

farm with a capacity <strong>of</strong> 350 sows and its own feed<br />

mill, using an all-in-all-out batch management system.<br />

Following weaning <strong>of</strong> the previous litter, sows were housed<br />

in individual crates for 30 d, until served and pregnancy<br />

confirmed. Subsequently, weekly batches <strong>of</strong> 14-15 sows at<br />

the same gestation stage were loose-housed in a pen with<br />

individual feeders until 103-110 d <strong>of</strong> gestation, then moved<br />

to a farrowing room until weaning <strong>of</strong> piglets at approximately<br />

26 d <strong>of</strong> age. Four batches <strong>of</strong> sows were studied throughout<br />

pregnancy and lactation. Of these, two batches <strong>of</strong> sows<br />

(T2) were fed a top-dressing supplying 3 x10 5 cfu C-3102<br />

per gram complete feed, and two control batches (T1) were<br />

fed the basal top-dressing free <strong>of</strong> probiotic. The <strong>of</strong>fspring<br />

<strong>of</strong> the T1 control group were <strong>of</strong>fered T1 basal creep feed,<br />

while piglets <strong>of</strong> the T2 group were <strong>of</strong>fered basal feed<br />

supplemented with C-3102 supplying 3 x10 5 cfu C-3102 per<br />

gram complete feed. Each dam with her litter represented<br />

an experimental unit (replicate). Treatment groups (T1 and<br />

T2) were similar with respect to sow age/parity distribution.<br />

During lactation, weight loss <strong>of</strong> T2 sows was significantly<br />

lower, while mean weaning weight and growth, birth to<br />

weaning, <strong>of</strong> T2 piglets were significantly improved. The<br />

positive effect <strong>of</strong> C-3102 on sow condition during lactation,<br />

as evidenced by reduced weight loss, may improve sow<br />

milk production and conception rate. By weaning, T2 piglets<br />

were on average 0.5 kg heavier than T1 control piglets,<br />

possibly due to indirect (through the dam), or direct (through<br />

the creep feed) effects <strong>of</strong> the probiotic.<br />

Key words: sows, Bacillus subtilis C-3102, creep feed<br />

1019 G protein-coupled receptor120 (GPR120) transcription<br />

in intestinal epithelial cells are significantly<br />

affected by bacteria belonging to the Bacteroides,<br />

Proteobacteria, and Firmicutes phyla. M. Fredborg, P.<br />

K. Theil, B. B. Jensen, and S. Purup,* Aarhus University,<br />

Denmark.<br />

Free fatty acids (FFAs) are produced in the intestine by<br />

microbial fermentation. Recently, a family <strong>of</strong> G proteincoupled<br />

receptors (GPR) acting as FFA transporters has<br />

been reported; including GPR120 which is expressed by<br />

intestinal epithelial cells and has been reported to function<br />

as a control point for anti-inflammatory effects. The aim<br />

<strong>of</strong> the present study was to evaluate whether 12 selected<br />

intestinal bacteria, representing the 3 major phyla present<br />

in the intestine, affects intestinal epithelial cell GP120transcription<br />

Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells were cultured<br />

on filter inserts for 21 d until fully differentiated. Supernatants<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 12 bacteria were added to cell culture medium at<br />

the apical side in a cell:bacteria ratio <strong>of</strong> 1:200. After 4 h<br />

incubation, changes in cellular transcription <strong>of</strong> GPR120<br />

by bacterial supernatant were examined using real time<br />

reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).<br />

Supernatants from 6 <strong>of</strong> the 12 bacteria analyzed influenced<br />

the mRNA level <strong>of</strong> GPR120 significantly (P < 0.05) compared<br />

with cells without added bacteria. A significant increase in<br />

cellular GPR120 mRNA was observed by E. faecium, L.<br />

reuteri, L. salivarius, E. coli K-12, B. fragilis and F. prausnitzii.<br />

The greatest increase was observed by the latter 2, which<br />

<strong>XII</strong> INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON<br />

DIGESTIVE PHYSIOLOGY OF PIGS<br />

45<br />

Session I<br />

was observed to increase cellular GPR120 mRNA level by<br />

>2.1 fold. Intriguingly, these bacteria are categorized as<br />

either probiotics or bacteria capable <strong>of</strong> introducing an antiinflammatory<br />

effect. The beneficial effect <strong>of</strong> these bacteria<br />

may very well be mediated by regulation <strong>of</strong> GPR120. The<br />

regulation <strong>of</strong> GPR120 by intestinal microbiota represents<br />

a direct signaling pathway for gut bacteria to affect host<br />

health and metabolism.<br />

Key words: bacteria, GPR120, intestinal epithelial cells<br />

1020 Intestinal delivery <strong>of</strong> probiotics bacteria protected<br />

with succinylated β-lactoglobulin tablets and<br />

their effects on pig intestinal microbiota. I. Paquette* 1,2 ,<br />

J.-P. Brousseau 2 , G. Talbot 2 , M. Lessard 2 , R. Caillard 1 , and<br />

M. Subirade 1 , 1 Université Laval, Département des sciences<br />

et technologie des aliments, Québec, Québec, Canada,<br />

2 Dairy and Swine R & D Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food<br />

Canada, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.<br />

This study was performed to evaluate the potential <strong>of</strong><br />

succinylated β-lactoglobulin (β-lg) tablets to protect 2<br />

probiotics, Lactobacillus helveticus (Lh) and Bifidobacterium<br />

longum (Bl) from in vitro gastric condition and to determine,<br />

in vivo, the influence <strong>of</strong> delivering protected probiotics in<br />

succinylated β-lg tablets on intestinal microbiota. To realize<br />

in vivo study, 48 weaned piglets <strong>of</strong> 28 d-old, were divided<br />

into 3 groups and received one <strong>of</strong> the following tablets<br />

daily: Group 1) succinylated β-lg tablets without probiotics,<br />

Group 2) non-succinylated β-lg tablets with 10 9 cfu <strong>of</strong> Lh<br />

and Bl, Group 3) succinylated β-lg tablets with 10 9 cfu <strong>of</strong><br />

Lh and Bl. After 14 and 28 d <strong>of</strong> treatment, 8 piglets per<br />

group were euthanized and colon contents were sampled<br />

to characterize bacterial population (selective medium<br />

and T-RFLP) and confirm the presence <strong>of</strong> Bl by qPCR. In<br />

vitro study showed that after 1 h incubation in simulated<br />

gastric condition, more than 10 9 cfu <strong>of</strong> each strain were<br />

still viable when incorporated in succinylated β-lg tablets.<br />

In vivo, piglets receiving protected probiotics had higher (P<br />

≤ 0.05) bifidobacteria counts in colon content than groups<br />

1 and 2 after 28 d. These results suggest that the use <strong>of</strong><br />

succinylated β-lg tablets helped maintain the viability <strong>of</strong><br />

the probiotics as they were delivered into the intestine.<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> colonic microbiota T-RFLP pr<strong>of</strong>iles showed that<br />

the relative abundance <strong>of</strong> bacterial population belonging<br />

to Ruminococcaceae was significantly different between<br />

treatments (P ≤ 0.05), with a higher abundance for group<br />

3. However, diversity indices (Evenness and Shannon)<br />

calculated from T-RFLP pr<strong>of</strong>iles revealed no major influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> our treatments on the colonic microbiota. Using specific<br />

primers for Bl, qPCR assays showed its presence in the<br />

colon <strong>of</strong> animals receiving tablets containing probiotics<br />

(groups 2 and 3). In conclusion, these results suggest that<br />

the protected probiotics were delivered alive in the intestine<br />

and their daily administration can modulate specific bacterial<br />

populations without affecting the overall microbiota.<br />

Key words: probiotics, microbiota, encapsulation<br />

1021 Dietary supplementation with alkaline phosphatase<br />

affects intestinal microbial populations <strong>of</strong> nursery<br />

pigs. M. H. Rostagno* 1 , J. Ferrel 2 , J. S. Radcliffe 3 , and B. T.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!