CSA-Journal-2016-04
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
tracyanum. After reading a number of<br />
taxonomic papers, it seems that subgeneric<br />
rankings of subspecies or section have<br />
been used variously for cymbidiums over<br />
the years. The most recent is the section<br />
arrangement used by Du Puy and Cribb in<br />
the book, “The Genus Cymbidium”. We’ll<br />
use that one here. All of these rules are laid<br />
out by the International Association for<br />
Plant Taxonomy.<br />
What is a cymbidium? The definition<br />
of the genus Cymbidium was published<br />
in 1799 by Olof Peter Swartz in the journal<br />
whose title is abbreviated: Nov Act Soc Sc<br />
Upsal. Swartz was probably the first specialist<br />
in orchid taxonomy and he studied<br />
under Linnaeus the younger, whose father<br />
established the binomial nomenclature we<br />
use today. There are various descriptions of<br />
the genus but one of the best is in the book<br />
entitled “The Genus Cymbidium” by David<br />
Du Puy and Phillip Cribb (see references).<br />
The features that identify cymbidiums include<br />
aspects of leaf anatomy, pseudobulb<br />
structure and either two or four pollinia.<br />
Under this careful definition of cymbidium,<br />
how many actual species are there?<br />
There are some places to look, especially<br />
in web accessible databases. First, there is a<br />
working list of all plant species, The Plant<br />
List, created by Royal Botanic Gardens,<br />
Kew and the Missouri Botanical Garden<br />
and posted in the internet at http://www.<br />
theplantlist.org/. These institutions gathered<br />
all of the plant checklist datasets they<br />
could find and generated a stupendous<br />
master list. The new list combines a number<br />
of already huge lists stretching from<br />
the 200,000 names in the International<br />
Organization of Plant Information to the<br />
“Tropicos” information system of the Missouri<br />
Botanical Garden which holds over<br />
a million names and 3.9 million herbarium<br />
specimens. They further examined all of<br />
the names and rated those with sufficient<br />
information as “Accepted”. The synonyms<br />
and unresolved names are also included.<br />
Fig. 1. Olof Peter Swartz (1760-1818).<br />
The author of the genus description for<br />
cymbidiums published in 1799<br />
We therefore may count the cymbidium<br />
information here as reasonably authoritative<br />
and probably inclusive. The Plant List<br />
returns 527 entries under the search term<br />
Cymbidium. Of these, 92 were rated as<br />
“Accepted”. Removing the subspecies and<br />
varieties leaves 72 species. In contrast Du<br />
Puy and Cribb in the 2007 book list 52 species.<br />
The difference stems from several issues.<br />
Some names have been assigned in<br />
new reports published after the book. However,<br />
Du Puy and Cribb examined hundreds<br />
of plant specimens in herbaria around the<br />
world as well as the literature and they resolved<br />
a number of the ambiguous names.<br />
If we combine the 52 well annotated ones<br />
and the new species the total comes to 60<br />
species (Table 1).<br />
For ease of handling, the species are<br />
arranged into sections. There are 11 sections<br />
in the genus. If we exclude the six sections<br />
with one or two species, the majority<br />
are divided among four sections: Cymbidi-<br />
40