CSA-Journal-2016-04
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the notation, "Sa 1944," which seemed to<br />
indicate that this might be the original label<br />
from the Sander firm.<br />
History<br />
A study of the literature of Cymbidium<br />
parishii indicates that only a few plants ever<br />
reached England, either of the type or of<br />
the 'Sanderae' variety. Cymbidium parishii<br />
Reichb. (Trans. Linn. Soc., Vol. 30, p.<br />
144, 1873 or 1874) was discovered by the<br />
Reverend C. S. Parish in 1859 while he was<br />
stationed in Burma. Becoming interested<br />
in the native orchids, his first collection<br />
consisted of six large cases of orchids from<br />
the Moulmein Hills in southern Burma.<br />
Among the orchids were several plants of<br />
a new type of Cymbidium which Parish<br />
thought to be a variety of eburneum, but<br />
which was later named parishii by Reichenbach<br />
as a new species. The entire consignment<br />
intended for England was lost in<br />
the Ganges River. Parish said he flowered<br />
several of the new Cymbidiums in Burma<br />
in 1867-68, but they did not survive. In<br />
1867 he sent two plants of the Cymbidium<br />
to Messrs. Low of Clapton, England, and<br />
about this time a dried specimen is believed<br />
to have been sent to Sir William Hooker<br />
of Kew, who believed it to be a variety of<br />
eburneum, and as late as 1893, years after<br />
Reichenbach had named it parishii, Hooker<br />
referred to it as eburneum 'Parishii' in his<br />
"Flora of British India" (Vol. 6, p. 12). But<br />
Rolfe later said (Orchid Review, Vol. 12,<br />
19<strong>04</strong>, p. 164), "by this time it was little<br />
more than a tradition ... it is doubtful if the<br />
original plants now exist."<br />
One of the Low plants was acquired<br />
by Mr. John Day of Tottenham in 1870 and<br />
one by Mr. W. Leech (sometimes spelled<br />
Leach) of Manchester from Messrs. Rollisson<br />
of Tooting, in 1875. The latter was<br />
probably a part of one of the two original<br />
introductions, for I find no record of further<br />
introductions of the species until the<br />
'Sanderae' variety was found. This is uncertain,<br />
since a number of persons later<br />
exhibited parishii, one under the name of<br />
Rutherford's variety.<br />
In 1872, Reichenbach (Gardeners'<br />
Chronicle, Vol. 1, New Series, March 14,<br />
1874, p. 338) examined a dried specimen<br />
of the plant at Richmond, Surrey, in the<br />
presence of Reverend Parish. On this basis,<br />
before the species had ever flowered in<br />
England, he named it Cymbidium parishii as<br />
a distinct species.<br />
Flowering<br />
In 1878 (Gard. Chron, Vol. 10, n.s.,<br />
pt. 2, July 20, 1878, p. 74) Mr. Swan, grower<br />
for Mr. Leech, stated in a letter of June<br />
25th that his flower of parishii was open on<br />
June 18th (Tuesday) and that he had seen<br />
Mr. Day's plant "in bud last Wednesday"<br />
(June 19th). Therefore, contrary to some<br />
accounts, we must grant the honor of flowering<br />
Cym. parishii first in Europe to Mr.<br />
Leech of Manchester on June 18, 1878. I<br />
have gone into much detail regarding these<br />
dates because many accounts are contradictory<br />
and I believe the above dates clarify<br />
the actual times of importing Cym. parishii<br />
into England and the actual date of first<br />
flowering in Europe. Mr. Swan had sent<br />
one of Mr. Leech's flowers to Reichenbach<br />
about June 25, 1878.<br />
The Day plant flowered shortly after<br />
Leech's was sold for 100 guineas to B. S.<br />
Williams' firm, who again flowered it, and<br />
a sketch was made for the Orchid Album<br />
(Vol. 1, t. 25, 1882). In 1885, Cym. parishii<br />
received an F.C.C. award from the<br />
Royal Horticultural Society, awarded to<br />
Lawrence (probably Sir Trevor Lawrence).<br />
There are records of Cym. parishii having<br />
been exhibited a number of times, even as<br />
late as 1912. These may be the 'Sanderae'<br />
variety or other Micholitz clones, since the<br />
Orchid World (Vol. 6, 1916, p. 129) states<br />
32