29.05.2017 Views

34856893457934

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The defense knew an insurmountable quantum of evidence pointed directly to Ross—the fake<br />

IDs, Ross’s old friend Richard Bates from Austin testifying against him, the tens of millions of dollars<br />

found on Ross’s laptop, and Jared testifying that he had worked for Ross as an undercover employee.<br />

People in the courtroom could see that in the case of United States of America v. Ross William<br />

Ulbricht, one side was clearly winning.<br />

After three weeks of trial, the closing arguments were presented.<br />

“His conduct was brazenly illegal; he knew perfectly well what he was doing the whole time,”<br />

Serrin Turner, the prosecutor, bellowed as he paced in front of the jury. “He built it. He grew it. He<br />

operated it from top to bottom until the very end.” As he spoke, Serrin grew more exasperated by the<br />

defense Ross had given.<br />

“He thinks he can pull one over on you—” Serrin thundered to the jury.<br />

“Objection!” Ross’s lawyer tried to interject.<br />

“—and then there is the defendant’s attempt to explain away mountains of evidence on his<br />

computer,” Serrin continued, ignoring the defense lawyer. “It’s a hacker.”<br />

“Objection!!”<br />

“It’s a virus,” Serrin ridiculed. “It’s ludicrous. There were no little elves that put all of that<br />

evidence on the defendant’s computer.” He finally concluded, peering at the men and women of the<br />

jury: “He knew perfectly well what he was doing the whole time, and you should find him guilty on<br />

all counts.”<br />

When it was the defense’s turn, Dratel stood up, vexed by Serrin’s speech.<br />

“One of the fundamental principles in this case is that DPR and Mr. Ulbricht cannot be the same<br />

person,” Dratel began. “Saving those chats, does that sound like DPR? You have to actually enable<br />

the chats to be saved.” He went on, noting that the Dread Pirate Roberts would never have made such<br />

a silly mistake: “Keeping a journal like that and then saving it on your laptop? A little too<br />

convenient.”<br />

He pointed to the evidence found on the laptop and said it had been put there by someone else. It<br />

was the real Dread Pirate Roberts, who knew the Feds were closing in, and while Ross was in the<br />

library downloading a TV show onto his laptop, the real DPR placed the chat logs and other evidence<br />

on his computer. “There are a lot of blinking neon signs in this case that have been created to<br />

incriminate Mr. Ulbricht,” he shrieked. “It is not the same person.”<br />

Dratel argued skillfully that in November 2011 Ross had given the site away. A site that he,<br />

regretfully, had started. That Ross had then left for Australia to start his life anew and get away from<br />

the monster he had birthed. “The Internet is not what it seems; you can create an entire fiction.”<br />

Finally Dratel asserted that the government in no way had proved beyond a reasonable doubt that<br />

Ross Ulbricht was the Dread Pirate Roberts. “I’m confident . . . in deliberations, you will reach only<br />

one conclusion: Ross Ulbricht is not guilty on every count in the indictment.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!