29.05.2017 Views

Sycamore Row - John Grisham

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16<br />

Since the arrival of Mr. Hubbard’s last will and testament two weeks earlier, the<br />

morning mail had become far more interesting. Each day brought a new wrinkle as<br />

more lawyers piled on and scrambled for position. Wade Lanier filed a petition to<br />

contest the will on behalf of Ramona and Ian Dafoe, and it proved inspirational. Within<br />

days, similar petitions were filed by lawyers representing Herschel Hubbard, his<br />

children, and the Dafoe children. Since petitions were allowed to be liberally amended,<br />

the early drafts followed the same basic strategy. They claimed that the handwritten will<br />

was invalid because (1) Seth Hubbard lacked testamentary capacity and (2) he was<br />

unduly influenced by Lettie Lang. Nothing was offered to substantiate these allegations,<br />

but that was not unusual in the suing business. Mississippi held to the practice of “notice<br />

pleading,” or, in other words, just lay out the basics and try to prove the specifics later.<br />

Behind the scenes, Ian Dafoe’s efforts to convince Herschel to join ranks with the<br />

Wade Lanier firm proved unproductive and even caused a rift. Herschel had not been<br />

impressed with Lanier and thought he would be ineffective with a jury, though he had<br />

little to base this on. In need of a Mississippi lawyer, Herschel approached Stillman Rush<br />

with the idea of representing his interests. As the attorneys for the 1987 will, the Rush<br />

firm was facing a declining role in the contest. It would have little to do but watch, and<br />

it looked doubtful Judge Atlee would tolerate its presence, even from the sideline, with<br />

the meter ticking, of course. Herschel made the shrewd decision to hire the highly<br />

regarded Rush firm, on a contingency basis, and said good-bye to his Memphis attorney.<br />

While the contestants of the will jockeyed for position, the proponents fought among<br />

themselves. Rufus Buckley made an official entry into the case as local counsel for Lettie<br />

Lang. Jake filed a trivial objection on the grounds that Buckley did not have the<br />

necessary experience. The bombs landed when Booker Sistrunk, as promised, filed a<br />

motion to remove Jake and replace him with the firm of Sistrunk & Bost, with Buckley<br />

as the Mississippi attorney. The following day, Sistrunk and Buckley filed another<br />

motion asking Judge Atlee to remove himself on the vague, bizarre grounds that he held<br />

some sort of bias against the handwritten will. Then they filed a motion requesting a<br />

change of venue to another, “fairer” county. In other words, a blacker one.<br />

Jake spoke at length to a litigator in Memphis, a stranger connected by a mutual<br />

acquaintance. This lawyer had tangled with Sistrunk for years, was no fan, but had<br />

come to grudgingly admire the results. Sistrunk’s strategy was to blow up a case, reduce<br />

it to a race war, attack every white person involved, including the presiding judge if<br />

necessary, and haggle over jury selection long enough to get enough blacks on the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!