Transverse Stability after RPE in y Cleft Palate Patients
Transverse Stability after RPE in y Cleft Palate Patients Transverse Stability after RPE in y Cleft Palate Patients
CConclusion l i #2 Fan‐Haas Combo UCLA Expander
Conclusion #3 • Expansion is less stable in the anterior palate (max. canines and 1st ( premolars) p ) • Clinical Recommendations: – LLeave UCLA Expander E d iin place l after ft expansion i for f retention or… – Use modified trans‐palatal arch design
- Page 1 and 2: Transverse Stability y after RPE in
- Page 3 and 4: Epidemiology of Cleft Palate • 1.
- Page 5 and 6: Overview of Treatment • Complex t
- Page 7 and 8: Deciduous Canine Permanent Unilater
- Page 9 and 10: Stability of Expansion • Conflict
- Page 11 and 12: Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography •
- Page 13 and 14: Statement of Purpose • The h purp
- Page 15 and 16: Data Collection • CBCT scans capt
- Page 17 and 18: UCLA‐Molen 3D Orientation Second,
- Page 19 and 20: UCLA‐Molen 3D Orientation
- Page 21 and 22: j‐Point j •Most Medial Point at
- Page 23 and 24: Absolute Measurements (mm) M 1st
- Page 25 and 26: Alveolar Cleft Width Measurements M
- Page 27: Conclusion #2 • Absolute expansio
- Page 31 and 32: Conclusion #4 • Relative expansio
- Page 33: Acknowledgements • Special Thanks
Conclusion #3<br />
• Expansion is less stable <strong>in</strong> the anterior palate<br />
(max. can<strong>in</strong>es and 1st ( premolars) p )<br />
• Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Recommendations:<br />
– LLeave UCLA Expander E d i<strong>in</strong> place l <strong>after</strong> ft expansion i for f<br />
retention or…<br />
– Use modified trans‐palatal arch design
Change language