Transverse Stability after RPE in y Cleft Palate Patients

Recommendations

Info

CConclusion l i #2 Fan‐Haas Combo UCLA Expander
Conclusion #3 • Expansion is less stable in the anterior palate (max. canines and 1st ( premolars) p ) • Clinical Recommendations: – LLeave UCLA Expander E d iin place l after ft expansion i for f retention or… – Use modified trans‐palatal arch design
Page 1 and 2: Transverse Stability y after RPE in
Page 3 and 4: Epidemiology of Cleft Palate • 1.
Page 5 and 6: Overview of Treatment • Complex t
Page 7 and 8: Deciduous Canine Permanent Unilater
Page 9 and 10: Stability of Expansion • Conflict
Page 11 and 12: Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography •
Page 13 and 14: Statement of Purpose • The h purp
Page 15 and 16: Data Collection • CBCT scans capt
Page 17 and 18: UCLA‐Molen 3D Orientation Second,
Page 19 and 20: UCLA‐Molen 3D Orientation
Page 21 and 22: j‐Point j •Most Medial Point at
Page 23 and 24: Absolute Measurements (mm) M 1st
Page 25 and 26: Alveolar Cleft Width Measurements M
Page 27: Conclusion #2 • Absolute expansio
Page 31 and 32: Conclusion #4 • Relative expansio
Page 33: Acknowledgements • Special Thanks

Transverse Stability after RPE in y Cleft Palate Patients

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?