Bausch and Lomb_Opposition_2_RamirezWritofCert_2017-03-14

JURISDICTION
Ramirez's Petition for Writ of Certiorari is untimely, and therefore this
Court does not have jurisdiction over the Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2101(c);
Supreme Court Rule 13.3. Petitioner acknowledges the Eleventh Circuit dismissed
the case on April 20, 2016, and, on the same day, returned, unfiled, his April 12,
2016, motion entitled "Unopposed Motion of Extraordinary Circumstances." See
Petitioner's Appendix, pp. 1, 34-42, 52.1 Petitioner now attempts, untimely, to
dispute the April 20, 2016, dismissal and the return of his motion.
After the appeal was dismissed, Petitioner untimely filed two motions to
reinstate the appeal on June 2, 2016 and August 1, 2016 (A.52). The Eleventh
Circuit denied those motions on July 14, 2016 and September 7, 2016 (A.52),
respectively.
On November 21, 2016, Petitioner sought an extension of time in which to
file a petition for certiorari in which he specifically sought to appeal the Eleventh
Circuit's September 7, 2016, order, stating: "The Order sought to be reviewed was
entered on September 7, 2016 at which (sic) it states; to not accept any further
filing by either party hence, the absence of a petition for either rehearing or
rehearing en banc." This Court granted an extension of time for Petitioner to file
his petition. However, despite the Court's requirement in Rule 14.1(e)(ii) that
I Citations to Petitioner's Appendix will be in the following form: "A.[page number]." Citations
to Respondent's Appendix will be in the following form: "R.A.[page number]."
2