Bausch and Lomb_Opposition_2_RamirezWritofCert_2017-03-14

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TABLE OF CITED AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases In re Beverly Mfg. Corp., 778 F.2d 666 (11th Cir. 1985)2 2 , 23 Cheney v. US. Dist. Court for Dist. of Columbia, 124 S. Ct. 2576, 542 U.S. 367 (2004)1 3 Faretta v. California, 95 S. Ct. 2525, 422 U.S. 806 (1975)1 5 Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. 89, 111 S. Ct. 453, 112 L.Ed.2d 435 (1990)2 2 Moton v. Cowart, 631 F.3d 1337 (11th Cir. 2011)1 5 Sandvik- v. United States, 177 F.3d 1269 (11th Cir. 1999)2 1 Statutes 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1)3 28 U.S.C. § 2101(c)2 , 3 , 11,12 Florida's Private Whistleblower Act, Fla. Stat. § 448.101 et. seq.5 Other Authorities 17 Charles A. Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Edward H. Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure: Jurisdiction § 4036, at 19 (3d ed.)1 2 Eleventh Circuit Rule 31-2p a s s i m Eleventh Circuit Rule 42-2p a s s i m Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 25p a s s i m iv
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 261 8 Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 271 7 , 19 Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 451 7 Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 471 9 Supreme Court Rule 10 1 4 , 15 Supreme Court Rule 142 Supreme Court Rule 13p a s s i m Supreme Court Rule 201 3 V
Page 1 and 2: Ogletree Deakins Karen M. Morinelli
Page 3 and 4: QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. D o Federal
Page 5: QUESTIONS PRESENTEDi TABLE OF CONTE
Page 9 and 10: JURISDICTION Ramirez's Petition for
Page 11 and 12: STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND RULES INVO
Page 13 and 14: After remand, the district court ag
Page 15 and 16: and to "find that the circumstances
Page 17 and 18: On November 21, 2016, Ramirez sough
Page 19 and 20: filing by either party hence, the a
Page 21 and 22: 2587, 542 U.S. 367, 381 (2004) (cit
Page 23 and 24: F.3d 1337, 1341 n.2 (11th Cir. 2011
Page 25 and 26: Simply calling a document a motion
Page 27 and 28: motion to set aside the dismissal a
Page 29 and 30: (Petition, p. 11). Nevertheless, th
Page 31 and 32: CONCLUSION AND RELIEF SOUGHT For al
Page 33 and 34: NO. 16-7880 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
Page 35 and 36: Dated March 13, 2017. Respectfully
Page 37 and 38: Case: 12-14679 Date Filed: 12/17/20
Page 39 and 40: R.A. 4 Case: 12-14679 Date Filed: 0
Page 41 and 42: P A Case: 12-14679 Date Filed: 01/0
Page 43 and 44: PA R Case: 12-14679 Date Filed: 01/
Page 45 and 46: D A 1 A Case: 12-14679 Date Filed:
Page 53 and 54: Qase: 15-11914 IDAte [CASE: 15-1191
Page 55 and 56: 'RES UNITED STATES 1 POSTAL SERVICF
Page 57 and 58:
The order of the United States Cour
Page 59 and 60:
A No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UN
Page 61 and 62:
1) A ')4 Rule 31-2. Briefs and Appe
Page 63 and 64:
0 A 1 4 Rule 42-2. Dismissal in a C
Page 65 and 66:
U.S.C. Title 28- JUDICIARY AND JUDI
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87:
Tampa, FL 33602 Telephone: (813) 28
show all

Bausch and Lomb_Opposition_2_RamirezWritofCert_2017-03-14

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?