Bausch and Lomb_Opposition_2_RamirezWritofCert_2017-03-14
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is appended <strong>and</strong> was not<br />
reported.<br />
This case presents issues of significant importance to a large sector of consumers in the United<br />
States. The statutes that the jurisdiction of this court is invoked under correspond to the Private<br />
Sector Whistleblower Laws <strong>and</strong> Act, as well as applicable statute to the Respondent that are<br />
relevant to the Pharmaceutical business such as, The Federal Food, Drug <strong>and</strong> Cosmetic Act;<br />
GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices <strong>and</strong>, CFRs (Code of Federal Regulations) 21 C.F.R., Parts<br />
210, 211, 820.<br />
Pro Se Petitioner's request for an extension of time is necessary due to the following facts;<br />
• Petitioner has, diligently, since the final Order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for<br />
the Eleventh Circuit seek for a Pro Bono counselor that can help since he cannot<br />
afford to pay thous<strong>and</strong>s of dollars to retain one. Furthermore, Petitioner has emailed<br />
potential counselors admitted to the Supreme Court, Law Schools, Bar Associations<br />
<strong>and</strong> has gone to legal aid clinics without success.<br />
• Petitioner Ramirez has determined that this is a case important for the consumer<br />
public safety <strong>and</strong> interest as well as, personally <strong>and</strong> professionally that, it warrants a<br />
petition for certiorari.<br />
• I am a Pro Se Petitioner who needs the additional time since; I am not school in the<br />
law.<br />
WHEREFORE, Petitioner Carlos Ramirez relies upon<br />
The Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States, Rule 13(3) states: