Bausch and Lomb_Opposition_2_RamirezWritofCert_2017-03-14
1 D A 11 EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST FOR A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI No. In The Supreme Court of The United States Carlos Ramirez, Petitioner, V. Bausch and Lomb Inc., Respondent. APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT To the Honorable Chief Justice of the United States: Pursuant to Title 28, United State Code, Section 2101(c) and rules 13.5 and 30.2 of the Supreme Court of the United States, application is made for an extension of time within which to file a petition for a writ of certiorari in this matter be extended for sixty (60) days, to and including, February 3, 2017. The order sought to be reviewed is that of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in the case entitled Carlos Ramirez versus Bausch & Lomb, Inc.,(SVRX) The Order sought to be reviewed was entered on September 7, 2016 at which it states; to not accept any further filling by either party hence, the absence of a petition for either rehearing or rehearing en banc. The time allowed by law for filing a petition for a writ of certiorari will expire on, December 5, 2016. This Application-request is being filed at least ten days before that date. The Jurisdiction of the Court would be invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1254.
The order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is appended and was not reported. This case presents issues of significant importance to a large sector of consumers in the United States. The statutes that the jurisdiction of this court is invoked under correspond to the Private Sector Whistleblower Laws and Act, as well as applicable statute to the Respondent that are relevant to the Pharmaceutical business such as, The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices and, CFRs (Code of Federal Regulations) 21 C.F.R., Parts 210, 211, 820. Pro Se Petitioner's request for an extension of time is necessary due to the following facts; • Petitioner has, diligently, since the final Order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit seek for a Pro Bono counselor that can help since he cannot afford to pay thousands of dollars to retain one. Furthermore, Petitioner has emailed potential counselors admitted to the Supreme Court, Law Schools, Bar Associations and has gone to legal aid clinics without success. • Petitioner Ramirez has determined that this is a case important for the consumer public safety and interest as well as, personally and professionally that, it warrants a petition for certiorari. • I am a Pro Se Petitioner who needs the additional time since; I am not school in the law. WHEREFORE, Petitioner Carlos Ramirez relies upon The Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States, Rule 13(3) states:
- Page 5 and 6: QUESTIONS PRESENTEDi TABLE OF CONTE
- Page 7 and 8: Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure
- Page 9 and 10: JURISDICTION Ramirez's Petition for
- Page 11 and 12: STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND RULES INVO
- Page 13 and 14: After remand, the district court ag
- Page 15 and 16: and to "find that the circumstances
- Page 17 and 18: On November 21, 2016, Ramirez sough
- Page 19 and 20: filing by either party hence, the a
- Page 21 and 22: 2587, 542 U.S. 367, 381 (2004) (cit
- Page 23 and 24: F.3d 1337, 1341 n.2 (11th Cir. 2011
- Page 25 and 26: Simply calling a document a motion
- Page 27 and 28: motion to set aside the dismissal a
- Page 29 and 30: (Petition, p. 11). Nevertheless, th
- Page 31 and 32: CONCLUSION AND RELIEF SOUGHT For al
- Page 33 and 34: NO. 16-7880 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
- Page 35 and 36: Dated March 13, 2017. Respectfully
- Page 37 and 38: Case: 12-14679 Date Filed: 12/17/20
- Page 39 and 40: R.A. 4 Case: 12-14679 Date Filed: 0
- Page 41 and 42: P A Case: 12-14679 Date Filed: 01/0
- Page 43 and 44: PA R Case: 12-14679 Date Filed: 01/
- Page 45 and 46: D A 1 A Case: 12-14679 Date Filed:
- Page 47 and 48: Case: 12-14679 Date Filed: 02/11/20
- Page 49 and 50: Case: 15-11914 Date Filed: 02/16/20
- Page 51 and 52: Case: 15-11914 Date Filed: 02/16/20
- Page 53 and 54: Qase: 15-11914 IDAte [CASE: 15-1191
- Page 55: 'RES UNITED STATES 1 POSTAL SERVICF
- Page 59 and 60: A No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UN
- Page 61 and 62: 1) A ')4 Rule 31-2. Briefs and Appe
- Page 63 and 64: 0 A 1 4 Rule 42-2. Dismissal in a C
- Page 65 and 66: U.S.C. Title 28- JUDICIARY AND JUDI
- Page 67 and 68: U.S.C. Title 28- JUDICIARY AND JUDI
- Page 69 and 70: U.S.C. Title 28- JUDICIARY AND JUDI
- Page 71 and 72: U.S.C. Title 28- JUDICIARY AND JUDI
- Page 73 and 74: U.S.C. Title 28- JUDICIARY AND JUDI
- Page 75 and 76: U.S.C. Title 28- JUDICIARY AND JUDI
- Page 77 and 78: U.S.C. Title 28- JUDICIARY AND JUDI
- Page 79 and 80: U.S.C. Title 28- JUDICIARY AND JUDI
- Page 81 and 82: U.S.C. Title 28- JUDICIARY AND JUDI
- Page 83 and 84: U.S.C. Title 28- JUDICIARY AND JUDI
- Page 85 and 86: U.S.C. Title 28- JUDICIARY AND JUDI
- Page 87: Tampa, FL 33602 Telephone: (813) 28
1 D A 11<br />
EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST FOR A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI<br />
No.<br />
In The Supreme Court of The United States<br />
Carlos Ramirez, Petitioner,<br />
V.<br />
<strong>Bausch</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Lomb</strong> Inc., Respondent.<br />
APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF<br />
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FOR<br />
THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT<br />
To the Honorable Chief Justice of the United States:<br />
Pursuant to Title 28, United State Code, Section 2101(c) <strong>and</strong> rules 13.5 <strong>and</strong> 30.2 of the<br />
Supreme Court of the United States, application is made for an extension of time within which to<br />
file a petition for a writ of certiorari in this matter be extended for sixty (60) days, to <strong>and</strong><br />
including, February 3, <strong>2017</strong>.<br />
The order sought to be reviewed is that of the United States Court of Appeals for the<br />
Eleventh Circuit in the case entitled Carlos Ramirez versus <strong>Bausch</strong> & <strong>Lomb</strong>, Inc.,(SVRX)<br />
The Order sought to be reviewed was entered on September 7, 2016 at which it states; to not<br />
accept any further filling by either party hence, the absence of a petition for either rehearing or<br />
rehearing en banc.<br />
The time allowed by law for filing a petition for a writ of certiorari will expire on,<br />
December 5, 2016. This Application-request is being filed at least ten days before that date.<br />
The Jurisdiction of the Court would be invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1254.
Change language