Bausch and Lomb_Opposition_2_RamirezWritofCert_2017-03-14
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Qase: 15-11,9_<strong>14</strong> D.ax Filed: 02/16/2016 Page: 5 of 8<br />
[CASE: 15-119<strong>14</strong>1 W a g e S of<br />
4. I work on this matter despite my own life circumstances; unstable housing<br />
situation.<br />
5. Besides, due to the recent Order on a Motion to strike Appellant will, need<br />
more time to, reorganize the materials for the filing of his corrected initial brief <strong>and</strong><br />
appendix.<br />
6. Furthermore, Appellant would like for this Honorable Court Judges to<br />
consider the following 'unfavorable' delay that lapses for Appellant to receive<br />
legal correspondence by U.S. mail in this matter. For example, the recent Appeals<br />
Court Order filed <strong>and</strong> postmarked on 01/29/2016, it arrived to Tampa on<br />
02/01/2016 <strong>and</strong> was picked up by Appellant on 02/05/2016.<br />
7. Moreover, the extensiveness of the docket overwhelms me <strong>and</strong> its time<br />
consuming.<br />
8. Also, consider the fact that, I am not an attorney though a justice <strong>and</strong> truth<br />
seeker. Appellant is not school on law.<br />
9. Accordingly, the Appellant is requesting an extra thirty (30) days<br />
extension in which to file his corrected reply brief <strong>and</strong> supplemental Appendix.<br />
10. On February 11, 2016, Appellant contacted Appellees' Attorney over the<br />
phone <strong>and</strong> they do not oppose to this motion of extension of time request.
Change language