Bausch and Lomb_Opposition_2_RamirezWritofCert_2017-03-14
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
motion to set aside the dismissal <strong>and</strong> remedy the default showing extraordinary<br />
circumstances, accompanied by the required brief <strong>and</strong> appendix." See 11th Cir. R.<br />
42-2(e). "Such a motion must be filed within <strong>14</strong> days of the date the clerk enters<br />
the order dismissing the appeal." Id. Here, the motion to reinstate the appeal would<br />
have been timely if the clerk received it by May 4, 2016. Further, an "untimely<br />
filed motion must be denied unless the motion demonstrates extraordinary<br />
circumstances justifying the delay in filing the motion, <strong>and</strong> no further filings shall<br />
be accepted by the clerk in that dismissed appeal." 11th Cir. R. 42-2(e).<br />
Ramirez has never demonstrated any "extraordinary circumstances."<br />
Instead, according to both his April 12, 2016, <strong>and</strong> his June 2, 2016, motions,<br />
Ramirez waited until the last minute to prepare <strong>and</strong> attempt to file his initial brief<br />
<strong>and</strong> appendix (after receiving five extensions of time over the course of almost a<br />
year), experienced a technical difficulty, failed to determine when the post office<br />
closed, <strong>and</strong> did not timely submit his appendix. (A.38-40, 89-95). The additional<br />
reasons Ramirez mentions in his June 2, 2016, motion — "hardship life<br />
circumstances; unsteady housing circumstances, depression, anxiety, <strong>and</strong>, neck<br />
pain" — are substantially the same reasons Ramirez mentioned each of the five<br />
times he sought extensions of time in which to file his brief <strong>and</strong> appendix during<br />
his entire appeal. (e.g., A.70, Petitioner's Motion for Extension of February 11,<br />
2016, R.A.13-20).<br />
20