25.05.2017 Views

RAMIREZ_Appendix_Writ_Certiorari_2_6_2017

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case: 15-11914 Date (134 Filed: of 12/04/2015 2011) Page: 11 of 13<br />

justice will not be served by supplementing the record with materials Appellant<br />

could have presented to the district court, but failed to do so.<br />

None of these<br />

documents is related to subject matter jurisdiction. See Cabalceta, supra. Nor is<br />

it a situation where the district court had an incomplete picture of the material<br />

facts because of a party’s misrepresentation. See Dakota Indus., Inc. v. Dakota<br />

Sportswear, Inc. 988 F.2d 61, 63 (8th Cir. 1993). Rather, the Appellant in this<br />

case is seeking to introduce for the first time documents and information that are<br />

irrelevant and ancillary to the issues before this Court. Finally, granting the<br />

motion to strike is particularly appropriate in this case because the Appellant<br />

failed to request leave of this Court or appended material to his brief without first<br />

filing a motion to supplement.<br />

WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, Appellee Bausch & Lomb<br />

respectfully requests this Court strike the above-listed evidence in the <strong>Appendix</strong><br />

as well as references and arguments related to such evidence contained in the<br />

Appellant’s Brief, as such evidence was not properly before the district court.<br />

Respectfully submitted by,<br />

/s/ Lara J. Peppard<br />

Kevin Douglas Zwetsch, Esq.<br />

Florida Bar Number 0962260<br />

kevin.zwetsch@ogletreedeakins.com<br />

Lara J. Peppard, Esq.<br />

Florida Bar Number 0520055<br />

lara.peppard@ogletreedeakins.com<br />

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak<br />

& Stewart, P.C.<br />

A. 884

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!