RAMIREZ_Appendix_Writ_Certiorari_2_6_2017

Case: 15-11914 Date (133 Filed: of 12/04/2015 2011) Page: 10 of 13
I. APPENDIX NO. 57, P. 199 (P. 13)
Appellant references page 9 of the transcript of Javier Callejas’s deposition.
Although part of the Callejas deposition transcript is contained in the record below
(Dkt. 88-2), that page is not in the record.
J. APPENDIX NO. 69, P. 214-15 (P. 16)
Appellant references document bates numbered “CR F. 26 p. 274-275” (Job
Posting) in the appendix. This document is one of the documents produced by
Appellant in response to “Defendant’s Request to Produce” and is not in the record
or in the sealed documents filed with the district court.
K. APPENDIX NO. 72, P. 218-19 (P. 17)
Appellant references “DEF000462-463 Document responsive to Plaintiff
First Request #17” in the appendix, and in the brief he states they were “Def’s
sealed documents.”
These are not in the record or in the Defendant’s sealed
documents.
L. APPENDIX NO. 73, P. 220 (P. 17)
Appellant references “DEF349 Sealed Exhibits Document responsive to
Plaintiff’s First Request #1” in the Appendix.
This document is not the record
below or in the Defendant’s sealed documents.
It is clear based on the foregoing Eleventh Circuit authority, each document
impermissibly included in the Appellant’s Brief and the Appendix fails to
establish any adjudicative fact and should be stricken. Similarly, the interests of
A. 783